Sunday, January 11, 2015

The War On Hindus - Part 3 #MultiprongedAttack



(This is a MaxiPost)

There are many ways a country can be invaded. An “invasion” is commonly associated with a Military invasion. There are other ways too – Politically, Commercially, Culturally, and Populationally. 

**********

The first time the Americans encountered Islamic terrorism was way back around 1784. The Arabs (the Ottoman states of Tripoli, Tunis, Algiers and also Morocco) had a practice of demanding a “tribute” (call it Jaziya or Hafta) for safe passage of ships through the Mediterranean sea around them. Refusal to pay resulted in capture and enslavement of the ship crews by Islamic pirates followed by demands for ransom (Somali pirates are only the modern version).

In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman. When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once

Maybe Ambassador Abdrahaman was explaining the “root cause” that terror-apologists at NDTV, HeadlinesToday, TOI and G-37 specialists like Kiran Bedi are looking for. Later in 1801, then as President, Thomas Jefferson, refused to pay the Hafta and thus the first ever war by the US Navy was prosecuted against Islamic terrorism. It was also the first time US Navy came into international combat. It came to be known as the Barbary wars. The pirate states were defeated. Remember, Israel did not exist then. Oil wasn’t discovered in the Middle East till early 20th century, around 1908.

**********

During the 1960s and till the mid-70s most of the romantic films and songs of Bollywood were usually made in Kashmir. There’s a movie from 1962 called “Hum Dono” which features the song “Allah tero naam, Ishwar tero naam” although I’m not sure the Muslims will agree with that. They believe Allah is only one and there is no other God or name for him. There are movies with no Muslim characters in it but would suddenly have a Qawali out of the blue. Mind you, Qawalis are very entertaining and enjoyable. There were many Muslims in Bollywood who had screen names, like Dilip Kumar and Johny Walker. We discovered they were Muslims only much later. But nothing wrong in screen names.

Then in the 70s and 80s guys like the late Feroze Khan, an average actor who became a better director, who would often play characters with names like Rajesh, Ramesh or Shankar (Check out his character’s names in most of his movies). But sometimes his movies would suddenly spring an Islamic song out of the blue. “Qurbani” directed by him suddenly springs up the song “Allah ko pyaari hai qurbani” in a very contrived context. So too “Jaanbaaz”, with the song “Allah ho Akbar”. These “Allah” songs are often inserted in movies as stand-alone numbers with no relevance to the story or context. That trend continues till today. But the different turn is that there are songs that demean Hindu icons as Sushma Swaraj once pointed and Gaurav Sawant reminds us:

Over the years Bollywood has consistently ridiculed and abused Hindu icons. Alright, if you want to make satires or ridicule icons you are welcome to it. But what is obvious is that the very same people refuse to expose the hilarious nonsense in other religions. It has almost become mandatory to have some item number or movies which portray Hindu icons in a vulgar fashion while the slightest negative portrayal of a Christian or Muslim icon invites extreme anger and violent reactions. The cowards at the Censor Board not only cave into such reactions but also pre-empt directors from ridiculing religions other than Hinduism. One such anti-Hindu Sicko is the current Chairperson of the CBFC, Leela Samson, a Jewish-Christian:

That thing about “… Malamaal” isn’t a stray case either. Jokes about Johny Lever’s name Abdullah made the Censor Board force the film-makers to change his name in the movie to Habibullah. They can’t even stand jokes about a name but they’re okay with ridiculing Shiva or Radha. I need not remind anyone about the violent agitations over “Vishwaroopam” by Kamal Haasan. And another movie that ridicules Christian priests has been blocked by the same Censor Board for over two years:

Wow! It’s been held back because it might hurt the Christian community. This might hurt Muslims that might hurt Christians but no problems with anything that offends Hindu sentiments. It is this hypocrisy that Hindus are now revolting against. Our media pimps like Barka, Sagarika, Rajdeep and Co. stand by these hypocritical morons of CBFC and claim they are all for freedom of expression. These pimps and the morons in various State and Central govts cannot tolerate any play or book about Nathuram Godse. Sure he killed Gandhi and he did so knowingly and willingly. He’s a murderer but what is so tolerant about all these morons that they cannot stand a play about him? And that is their idea of free speech? Sick slaves of Sickularism! So how does Bollywood abuse Hindus and Hinduism so daringly and get away with it? What’s their incentive?

The other phenomenon that can’t be missed – Since the late 1980s and early 90s there has been a great influx of Muslim actors in Bollywood and TV. There are Khans from Bollywood families and from outside too. If there’s a shortage, the producers import Muslims from Pakistan (like Nargis Fakri or Veena Malik). In principle, there is absolutely nothing wrong if a good number of talented Muslims get into movies and TV. But is that the only thing? Mahesh Bhatt converted to Muslim to marry a second woman and is now a prime-promoter of Islamic culture in Bollywood and a ubiquitous spokie for them. Is all this mere coincidence or incentivised? The cultural turn in Bollywood to abusing or ridiculing Hinduism alone (PK is only one of many such incidents) is an “invasion” that  shouldn’t go unnoticed. Many Muslim actors from here and there are included in a movie out of financing or coercion by the mafia; like that Monica of Abu Salem.

**********

Many years after oil was discovered in the Middle East, OPEC was formed in 1960 with their HQ in Vienna, Austria. This is a Trade-Bloc or like a Cartel of oil-producing and exporting countries. From being barren desert regions, many ME countries suddenly grew wealthier and economically more influential. This time they had Israel as common enemy. So during the 1973 Egypt-Israel war the OPEC choked oil supplies to US and other countries and the prices dramatically soared due to the “rationing”. This embargo lasted a year resulting in inflation, recession and unemployment in many parts of the world. The Islamists realised their power and muscle. This was eventually combatted by alternate energy, other production sources and by 1980 the OPEC was in to an oil glut in the market. Prices dropped dramatically as they pumped out more oil than ever before. There was a deep impact on India too.

From the mid-70s onward lakhs of Indian labour migrated to ME to find jobs and earned better money than they did at home. They were exploited, their passports were seized, they could not follow their own religion, they could not strike. In short, they were turned into bonded slaves. Sheiks from the ME came to Hyderabad and Mumbai to shop for young girls to take back as slaves for their harems. The stories are too many and you can look them up. People sent home a lot of money, labourers returned home with two-in-ones in their hands and large bags of goodies. Parts of Kerala, like Cochin, had turned almost Dubai-like with Islamic influence. They went as labour but came back as Islamists. The Saudi Wahabis and others in the ME started investing in “Islamism” in India and her neighbours. Even countries like Sudan funded a rash of Madrassas – to amounts like 3000 crores. There are many towns in India which were completely Islamised with funds from ME. Bollywood too was no exception.

Since the mid-70s Petro-dollars have been funding Bollywood and simultaneously a new underworld, supported by certain politicians and ME funding, blossomed not only to control Bollywood but Mumbai itself. And it then extended to terrorism, cultural codes like Muslims who earlier wore dresses like anyone else adopted more Pathani dresses, skull caps and burqas. There was phenomenal growth of Mosques and Madrassas. If all that was only for educational upliftment of Muslims that would be one thing but it became an “assertive” Islamic culture which resulted in more and more demands and our Central and State govts fuelled this culture with more appeasements. Kashmir Pandits were thrown out of Kashmir. Kerala saw a dramatic Islamisation of the State. Bengal and Telangana are following the same routes. UP and Bihar became terror-hubs.

**********

From the late 1970s and 80s onward the Islamic and Muslim influence in Bollywood and other forms of arts started seeping in. Prominent among the conflict with Hindus was the nude paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddesses by MF Hussain and artists at Commie hotbeds like JNU.

Those who are offering a veiled defence for the #CharlieHebdo (CH) killings by Muslim terrorists cannot stop defending the perverted portrayals of Hindu Goddesses by MFH. Goddess Saraswati is considered the icon of knowledge by Hindus. Vijaya Dashmi is celebrated by Hindus with a “Puja” of their weapons, implements, tools and books – whichever is the work-pursuit of the person. Why would a moron want to paint her nude? And those who find CH’s cartoons offensive continue to defend MFH’s nude paintings of Hindu Goddesses. The C5M even asks why a nude Saraswati can’t be done when Indian laws specifically prohibit such a religious offence. Our laws prohibit any form of nudity and obscenity for commercial purposes. Hindus treat Goddesses as mother. Let me be extremely harsh and blunt – Only the most perverted pimps like Sagarika, Barkha, Rajdeep and their Commie filth encourage such hypocritical nonsense. I believe the MFH defenders are either perverts who have seen or want to see their mothers having sex or bisexuals or lesbians who are aroused by such paintings. And these are the very scumbags who will scream about women being used as commodity and sex objects.

Their hypocrisy has no limits when it comes to offending Muslim sentiments. That’s Islamic money and fear talking and not a sense of fairness. Let’s see some more perverts and their cowardly hypocrisy:

It’s a common refrain. The movie PK which ridicules and abuses Lord Shiva in an attempt to portray fraudulent godmen is fine with them but CH cartoons are not. There are fraudulent godmen, fraudulent and violence-encouraging Mullahs and pedophile Christian priests but the only ones consistently being targeted by Bollywood and media are the Hindu ones. And that is what is arming the Islamic violence further. The fear of Muslims agitating and/or killing the “offenders” makes our Bollywood and media pimps wet their pants and skirts. In contrast, the worst perverts in the media, like street-thug Rajdeep, equate the protests against MFH to the CH killings. Another bimbo called Rana Ayyub of the dead Tehelka equates even protests against Praveen Swami to the killings of CH artists. And the best part is, both Rajdeep and Sagarika, India’s most moronic media-couple behave like they are the real victims of the CH killings.

What is the message these cowards are sending? That unless Hindus too arm themselves and kill those who offend their religious sentiments it is okay to offend Hinduism, Hindu Gods and Goddesses and Hindus in general? MFH wasn’t killed. The cowardly Hindu-abuser ran from the Courts of India to a desert and died there. Maybe it’s nature’s retribution that he didn’t deserve to die in the holy soil of India which many ordinary people are blessed with the fortune to.

**********

If all that wasn’t enough, here’s the High-Pimptress of Hypocrisy and cheerleader of Pakistan and the anti-Hindu brigade in media:

As Rana Ayyub points out? I can’t help rolling over in laughter. This is Salma quoting Sabrina to somehow slam France in a twisted defence of the CH killings. The bimbo further goes on to slam France for practicing dual-standards of free speech. I wonder if she ever looks in her bathroom mirror at the face of hypocrisy and dual standards. First, France wasn’t the first country to ban protests. In fact France was one of the earliest victims of Palestinian terrorism (remember the AirFrance plane hijacked to Entebbe in 1976?).  France was the first country to impose an arms embargo on Israel after the 1967 war with Egypt to appease Muslims and Palestinians. Secondly, France is the country that housed the known fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini for ages before he returned to Iran and pronounced a death-fatwa on Barkha’s permanent darling Salman Rushdie. For both these Moronginis, Barkha and bimbo Ayyub, someone has specially written an article on how Muslim appeasement is making France pay a price. May be they should read and educate themselves because India has been paying this price for over 60 years and the cost of appeasement will only go higher.

After the CH killings there were Sickos on NDTV like Kiran Bedi and their anchors and some on Headlines Today who were still discussing the “root cause” nonsense. Street-thug Rajdeep called Taslima Nasreen for a discussion on CH killings. She slammed Islamic terrorists and she slammed cowardly hypocrites so much that he suddenly cut off the show to move to a breaking-news that wasn’t really urgent. I think I have fairly explained the “root cause” of Islamic violence, earlier in this post, which caused the Barbary wars.

The Chrislamist invasion and attack on Hindus follows multiple paths – Weaponry (through terrorism), Culturally, Politically and Commercially. Who’s the target? Hindus! Anything I left out? Oh yes, Populationally! We will deal with that in the concluding part of this series.


56 comments :

  1. Sharp, incisive and to the point without any beating about the bush.
    I am a neurosurgeon & have developed & honed my skills to get to the root of the problem without getting distracted by any white noise. Much in the same lines as surgery, is your way of writing. I admire your research and your writing skills. More power to your pen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Much of the world, including the media, works 'cloak & daggers' or 'smoke & mirrors'.... so all the bakras fall for all things 'democractic & civilized' while all power strokes are done real brutal - this has been happening throughout history.

      If 'survival of the fittest' is what it is, then if all the world were bombed then only the tribals in middle-east to pakistan would survive all the hardships to herald a world of belief in the 'merciful only God'! Such are their ruggedized horrible lifestyles!

      Hindus have to wake up to these realities to build up capacities that can sustain the core dharmic propositions on the one side while successfully meeting head-on these scary outcomes of exemplary root-cause analysis l
      That calls for a deep coordinated revolution within the hindu society across the world - a deep awakening to these realities than drowning oneself away through the easiest escape hole!

      Kudos Mediacrooks!

      Delete
  2. Time has come for CH type of satire of media morons.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Oh man.... these have been my feelings... well articulated... hope idiot secular Hindus wake up sooooon

    ReplyDelete
  4. Godse was entirely wrong in killing Gandhi but his reasons for vehemently disliking him are the same reasons that Hindus are realizing slowly, over 60 years later the same policies that led to partition and genocide are still in place and will certainly lead to a second partition or civil war if not aggressively curtailed. Nehru and Gandhi were team IOI1.0 and we have more and more sophisticated ones to deal with now, an entire network that has to be dismantled quickly and completely. Fortunately more and more people are now realizing it.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for the analysis. Root cause of most evil behaviour of people is unethical money they get to do as ordered by their financiers.

    ReplyDelete
  6. this is an eye opener for all lazy hindu marons. spread this post to every corner.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Biting incisive forays into the hollow defence of the scumbags who do not miss an opportunity to flaunt disparaging socialistic cocophonies only to malign their own religion and playing to the scorn and scoff of the chrislam terrorists headed by SG and co. Most unnerving attack on the pretensions of these SOBs who will not hesitate to play proud pimps to their own mothers! All the three parts of this torrential outpour of strident criticism against the double speak and dishonesty of the erstwhile ruling cliché which still continue to thwart and throttle the genuine aspirations of the majority community just for the heck of few bites of power and pelf stand as monumental expose of their imperial designs clothed in socialist rhetoric. You have rightly whipped up the Nationalistic pride to take up to arms if necessary to defend our Hindu culture and traditions.

    ReplyDelete
  8. We need to do a Hoover on these idiots in Bollywood where all these Khans dance at Dawood's parties in Dubai and supply escorts to Saudi businessmen in the name of foreign girl friends. COINTELPRO - Bollywood is the propaganda arm of Islam and media morons like Barka are the propaganda mistresses of Pakistan. Let's look into the salaries of these Khans and what their trips to Dubai make them. These Bast*rds and bit*ches need to be thrown in jail for sedition and anti-national activities.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Nicely written. Kudos.

    How about a comic strip exposing all the media pimps and presstitudes and their exploits

    ReplyDelete
  10. Good analysis. These media morons needs to be stripped off in daylight.

    ReplyDelete
  11. We saw in the 90's numerous attacks from underworld mafia on film industry stalwarts which included Rakesh Roshan, Gulshan Kumar, Divya Bharti, Saundarya. etc. But the moot question is what happened after the this wave of attacks, what was the eventual result of this madness. To answer this question we just have to look at the outcome. And the outcome is Gulshan Kumars death resulted in total change in music, and the change was done by first remixing old hindi songs with western tunes and american dance styles. Then after some time remixes stopped but the style now now became the norm directly in film songs. Today we see all filmy songs in western tunes. There is no Raag based songs anymore, no folk music anymore. It then percolated from hindi film industry to regional film industry, so that now all regional film songs be it marathi, kannadi, telugu, punjabi, bengali sound exactly the same, that is in western tunes. We have lost the diversity of our folk music based on regional cultures. I remember the advertisement by Nestle "Chanda hai tu" being sung by a mother in its original indian style, but the child is not interested, then comes the advise to remix it so the mother now sings "chanda hai tu" in western style, and finally it says "If you got to mix you got to remix". Sufi songs were also introduced in films, but they were few of them, majority being western tunes. So Islamic mafia attacking gulshan kumar leads to westernisation of songs.......that is christianisation. Souns amazing insit it?

    Divya bharati was on a rampage with so many films in so less time, but after her death saw the emergence of Aishwarya Rai's and Sushmita Sen's of the fashion world. Which is basically western ideals of beauty being thrusted upon the gullible indian masses, with western style dress sense, western style hair do . suddenly the long hairs with choti gone out of fashion and was being ridiculed, and western style shoulder length open hairs on both sides of ears became a norm. Bindi was pushed out to oblivion. So attack by Islamic mafia didnot result in burkha-i-zation of film industry but westernization ...thats is christainisation. amazing isnt it?


    Continued.............in next comment.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Buddy/Miss Buddy.. Why do you use a Samsung, a Sony, a Honda..u could easily buy a Tata car or a micromax phone(they claim to b 100% Indian)... Indian music is not lost..you are not trying to find it and blaming people who are searching for something else.. in the internet age everything would seem like blending. Indian songs with Western tune( WHAT THE HELL IS A WESTERN TUNE..rlly) When technology evolves so do the people embracing them.. Even today people record on live orchestras and such music comes out too.. You r not seeking to listen to it. You dance to the same tunes but complain on the internet may b coz its hip...Aishwarya Rai and Sushmita Sen..I mean do u read what you write.. hav u seen devdas..If u r a man, I would want to see how much Khaki you actually wear..or if u r a woman, How traditionally you dress up. Raise points where you can argue logically..pls..

      Delete
    2. Dear Sreejan,
      talk about mainstream music. Did it not westernized in last 10 years?
      Talk about top 20 songs in charts today. how many of them are based on Indian ragas and not western influences like rap / rock ? Compare them to top 20 songs of 95.
      Ofcourse things are slowly changing as we are moving back to melody but majority of the music industry is still heavily westernized. And the irony is, at the helm of this industry is Gulshan Kumar's son.

      Now about the sense of beauty, how many movies depict normal indian girls wearing a salwar suit(with chunni)? or sari? or choti? or bindi? How movies emphasize that fairness is not the only idea of beauty? Mind you, a dark skinned girl is never beautiful in movies. How many on screen beefed up heroes look like normal people?
      one in twenty.
      If this is not westernization, what is?

      Delete
  12. "Jassi jaisi koi nahi" like tv serials further drove home the point to westernize to be accepted in "modern" society. Radio Jockeys now blast the air in morning time with western style greetings...."good morning mumbaaaaaaaiiiiii". when two celebrities meet on a film awards night they greet each other by touching each others cheeks in western style, they dress in eloborate western suits and gowns, hindi film industry actors when interviewed talk in english, those not completely westernised talk in what is now called "hinglish" mixture of hindi and english, there is no term like "hinurdu" mixture of urdu and hindi, because that is not the case, it is just the westernisation. Dance reality shows have all western dances like very few of them perform indian dance if any. All the actors in movie are shown holding the "guitar" which is a western musical instrument not a single actor holds a "basuri" an indian musical instrument. Even old films are being "remade" in western style they say to suit the "modern" taste.

    There was this musical instrument shop in Pune which promoted raag based songs and kept it for sale on their shops, one fine day the shop owner is found dead and the shop now sells western music only. After the death of Bhimsen Joshi, immediately a concert happened in Pune which was a "fusion" between "shastriya" sangeet and western music, like rubbing salt on the wound. Ekta kapoor directed a Tv serial of Mahabharat with Greek style actors, can u believe it?

    Dont forget the Islamic terror bombing of indian cities was done from 1992 onwards but picked up after indian parliament attack in 2001-02, all indian cities were terror bombed. which suddenly stopped after the Nuclear deal was done in 2008. thereafter only sporadic terror incidents are happening. A deal which makes india a third world country with no testing rights and surrounded by two nuclear armed countries.
    I remember some analyst had said in Pakistan that Pakistan is a like a perpetual USED CONDOM of the west, it does its dirty job and then gets used again and again. Islamic radicalisation both home grown and paskistan based is being used against India to westernize it, in the era of Globalisation. Islam is just a step ladder to ultimately make India a western client state.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't agree to what was done to hussain was correct, i don't think he deserved because of his desires to see goddess saraswati naked, overseeing the hypocrisy from MF hussains part,doing what he wouldn't have dared to do for other religion . I do agree to ur expose of the hypocrisy of these superstars and the religion they suck up to and to major hypocrisy of others can be criticised but not them.
    I highly respect the view of hinduism as way of life and not be fanatic about its criticism mainly because of fanatics in another religion . I think nothing can be above literal or verbal criticism not even GOD of all religion, who just watches the drama unfold.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Just read this article and then tell how do you think about MF Hussain, who respect his religion that he don't take a minute liberty with it.
      http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2004-04-16/news/27404387_1_m-f-hussain-film-yash-chopra

      Delete
    2. Well I don't have to read the article for point i made. It is not about MF hussain,but rather freedom to express yourself as you please without doing any physical harm. I think its a hypocrisy in part of some hindus for the objection to the paintings as the temples themselves have naked scriptures and paintings, probably not of the god in question.

      Delete
    3. they dont have naked form of every incarantion of godess. The time you have take to make a point, i wish you really visit a mutt like sringeri to learn about these. Also, these temple do not have a parvati naked, sitting on Ganesha's head (mother and son). i would have still taken a naked parvati giving milk to a very baby ganesha, which in itself a very divine thing. neither do the temples have a naked saraswati on a ganesha's head (maternal uncle's wife). Please sir, do accept shit by all means, but do know what you are being served. And artistically speaking, those pictures were not worth a dime aesthetically.

      Delete
    4. you have the right to express yourself but so do others, and one should leave on individual to decide who is divine and who is not and not get offended by it. which makes a better society,in my opinion.

      Delete
    5. My Man,
      Sir, its not about nudity which upset Hindus in MFH's paintings.
      Its about portrayal of Sita, Ganesha, Parvati in sex orgies and pervert acts which offended one's faith.
      If someone draws such a painting of your mother, will you not be offended?

      Delete
  14. http://www.merinews.com/article/open-letter-to-bollywood/15903250.shtml

    Atleast now people will not remain silent to hypocrisy of the voluble / articulate people with half baked knowledge.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Superb write up Ravi. Must thank you making we Hindus wake up to constant attack by Muslim and Christian Lobby in India and also funding. In my mind, I have no doubt that the MSM B*/B* are on payroll of ME Sheikhs and Churches. The only way to stop it is to kill a few of these Vermins. It is duty of Hindus to protect Dharma from Adharma, Geeta is very clear about it and we need to take up Astra-Sastra.

    ReplyDelete
  16. merci beacoup monsieur ! encore

    ReplyDelete
  17. Ravinar, educating Hindus is the first step which is what you are doing. But what's the next step to win this covert war? Please do write about that too.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Time’s up for denial and hypocrisy - Le Pen,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Intellectual giant the late Christopher Hitchen's view about a guy called MK Gandhi: an unreformed and unrepentant appeaser.

      Delete
  19. For religion of peace... FOE means freedom of execution

    ReplyDelete
  20. Among the Muslim appeasement by France, Ravinar forgot that France was the only first world country which opposed Bush/Cheney's Iraq war. This made some stupid American Congressmen so mad that they proceeded to re-name French-fries in the congressional canteen as freedom-fries. Well grateful Muslims are rewarding France now.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I hope these Muslim appeasing pimps G-37 and C5M get the same treatment from grateful Muslims as France is getting.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Those days are not very far when these pimp anti Hindu Journos will be sorted out and will get some treatments on the street

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ravinar wrote: "I believe the MFH defenders are either perverts who have seen or want to see their mothers having sex or bisexuals or lesbians who are aroused by such paintings."

    On this particular aspect Ravinar, I completely disagree with you. I defend MFHs right to display his paintings in an access-restricted gallery.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sambaran,

      I dont have any problems MFH displaying his art works anywhere, including the nude ones. The problem as I have said is the hypocrisy.

      Although, you are wrong in your claim too. MFH put up these paintings for a public auction. He withdrew the nude Goddess paintings from the auction only after protests from various quarters. Please do check.

      Delete
    2. Sambaran,

      MFH or anybody forfeits his/her just rights if he/she has an agenda and is afraid to treat everybody or almost everybody equally. It would have been OK if MFH was equally vulgar towards Prophet Muhammad and/or Jesus Christ. At least Charlie Habedo publication was equally harsh towards Pope/Catholics, Judaism/Jews etc. as it was against Islam/Muslims.

      Delete
    3. Ravinar, don't be apologetic about the bigot MF Hussain. After some Muslim organisations took objections to one of the songs in the M F Hussain's film Meenaxi - A Tale of Three Cities , he ordered for immediate withdrawal of the film from public shows in the entire country (even though it was made from his personal investment), just to respect the sentiments of his religion.

      Here what he said then:

      "Since I have not sold the film, directed and produced by me, to anyone, including Chopra, I would like to stop screening of the film," he said.

      When asked for the reason behind it, Hussain said "I have not made the film to make money nor have I sold it to anyone. Therefore, I need not give any reason for withdrawal of the screening of the film to public."

      http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2004-04-16/news/27404387_1_m-f-hussain-film-yash-chopra

      Delete
    4. @Phanibhushan, I believe that MFH employed double standards. However, I will not mandate any free person to offend equally. Let MFH offend whoever he wants. Let him offend selectively. As long as he is displaying his wares in an access-restricted area with suitable visible disclaimers, it should be fine. Same freedom should apply to Tasleema and Salman Rushdie.
      I am pained to see that Indian government, instead of allowing freedom to each, bans all of them equally.
      Our MSM is a different beast and much more culpable than government.

      Delete
    5. "As long as he is displaying his wares in an access-restricted area with suitable visible disclaimers, it should be fine. "

      What does that mean???????? He was a famous name and his paintings was published in national newspaper......Also paintings are not just for displayed but also to sell....That means they will be displayed again and again in public.

      MFH has painted muslim historical female characters also but they were in veil......Why???

      Delete
    6. By displaying in access-restricted-area I mean a closed gallery/room/auditorium where the pictures will not spring on unsuspecting public suddenly. There should be clear warning signs at the entrance claiming "Sensibilities may be offended. Please do not enter if you wish not".
      The paintings will be sold only to those who will not be hurt, subject to the warning sign given above. The painting sale should not be in open public but in access-restricted-area. I do not know whether MFH employed these measures during the sale exhibitions. In this post, I am merely stating how I wish it should have been.
      It is the newspaper's fault if it carries the picture without sufficient warnings.
      Regarding MFH painting only Hindu goddesses disparagingly, I completely agree with you. He was employing worst form of double standards.

      Delete
    7. In the age of the internet, access restriction is impossible.

      Delete
    8. @R Patel
      I disagree. You can make access-restriction possible for unwilling eyes by giving a suitable warning message.

      Anyway, I feel I am getting embroiled in friendly-fire. The biggest concern remains the hypocritical approach of MSM. Hinduism is always the soft-target. It is fear and possibly-greed which results in MSM taking the pseudo-secularist stance. The pseudo-secularism in our collective minds must be annihilated.

      Delete
  24. Over centuries Hindus have been taught/trained to think through their casteist/ parochial/regional/linguistic minds. Added to this is the self-styled atheists/agnostics berating the public to think 'rationally'( when it suits them). However a majority of the population is so simple that they really don't see the guiles of the intellectual terrorists.
    It may take time but people have to be 'educated'. Reading Mediacrooks is must for it.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Arab has sytem to make your citizen their foot soldiers using one $ book and local mullahs who work for saudi . Our modern leaders are no match to this war plan .

    ReplyDelete
  26. Want to save you nation your race no way you can do if you allow you poor and uneducated convert to islam. Saudi way is simple use your local converts to kill you and destroy you nation. Making all followers to bow to them and makes these convert loyal to them and local mullah a local commander keep these local converts under his arms and control. This war of saudis is defend less and unless converts rights are curbed your death destruction of your nation is certain .

    ReplyDelete
  27. rana ayub &burkha dutt are factually incorrect. France has infact supported palestenina bid for nationhood in UN

    ReplyDelete
  28. Rana Ayyub's intellectual mind is blind to Muslim bigotry but obviously alive to anything loose from BJP or RSS. She obviously loves Asad Owaisi and his jingoistic brother Akbar Owaisi for their vitriol. See how she defends Asad Owaisi on NDTV (obviously) here http://www.ndtv.com/article/opinion/is-asaduddin-owaisi-re-inventing-himself-625020

    ReplyDelete
  29. (Ravinarji-Sorry for comment being bit longer)

    The way news channels especially ABP news, AajTak, News 18, Headline Today etc are panicked as if Shakshi Maharaj and Sadhvi Prachi have entered into bedrooms of media men and women and forcing them to produce 3 to 4 children at gun point! But everyone there taking due care not to mention reporting in Sachhar committee that ‘to use condom and Parivar Niyojan is against the tenant of Muslim religion’. So for one religion no bar in multiplying the numbers lest the religious sentiment gets hurt, whereas on the other side moment a religious leaders make statement be after him like rabid dogs. Similarly when conversion is going on unabatedly from Hindus is alight but the moment few get converted back to Hindus it becomes anti-secular sin. Purpose of the sickos is simple Hindu numbers should not be increased.

    Ravinarji is rightly using word ‘PIMP’ for English media persons. But Hindi translation of PIMP is ‘Bhadve’. So for such elements in Hindi channels can be addressed as ‘Bha…’?

    Yesterday debate on Hindi channels was on ‘Notice given to Shakshi Maharaj by his party BJP. Where Vijay Vidrohi who is known anti-BJP (read anti-Modi too) on a question why BJP gave notice to SM, said ‘Notice is given because Modi has to win further elections and increase nos. in Rajyasabha’. If notice would not have been given then the same ‘bha…’ would blame for ‘tacitly supporting SM’. Objection is not against debates being conducted, but when one time prominent leader and pro-Pakistani like Manishanker Aiyyar makes shameless statement covertly justifying Charlie Hebdo killers, BSP MP Qureshi praising the attackers and ready to pay Rs.51 crores no debate but cursory mentioned become enough. But is it because in the books of media they are secular? Media’s right to report and conduct debate is acknowledged but objection and doubt occurs when media involves itself in pimping (for Hindi media-in Bhadvagiri). Remonstration is against the kind of spin-off, twist that media persons in the studio give and participate in projecting as if Shakshi Maharaj and Sashvi Prachi have committed biggest crime.

    As Ravinar rightly elaborated these is the part of assault on Hindus.

    But the secular-idiots who have infiltrated media, academic institutions and intellectual class from the days of Nehru-Gandhi dynasty are not going to stop from enjoyment of foreplay of appeasement of minority. And is it happens they have delivered second generation of the same in the same places. Hindus have to be on guard as most of this class happen to be Hindu by accident of birth help in circulating confusion in Hindu minds.

    Secularism arose in the modern West as a revolt against the closed theology of Christianity which had acquired stranglehold on the State, In India unfortunately- ‘Secularism’ has become the biggest single protector of closed theologies of Christianity and Islam’- Sita Ram Goel, Hindu Temples ~(What Happened To Them).

    ReplyDelete
  30. High time Hidus are awakend and the Great Heriritage SAVED from these Media Morons !!!! Hats Off to you Ravinar !!!! HINDUS are no push overs hereafter !!!! They will ASSERT their RIGHTS in their MOTHER LAND . JAI HODUSTAN !!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Awakening of Hindus?!!! You must be joking!! HINDUS are the most divided and 'cowardly' lot!

      Delete
    2. To Rajanvt
      Please refrain from making such comments with no wisdom.
      Thank You

      Delete
  31. The general secular recommendations, to protest against objectionable content in a book or a movie is to counter attack with another book or movie.Never heard this prescription this time around when CH was attacked.Just wondering if the jihadis should have produced another cartoon depicting Jesus to counter the cartoon of Mohammed.So again hypocrisy at its best.

    ReplyDelete
  32. Crooks within Media who day in day out debating Shakshi Maharaj and Sadhvi Parchi had neither debated nor will debate ever.

    1. Syro-Malabar Church – Kerala: Catholics should have 5 children
    The Syro-Malabar Church (SMC), apparently India’s largest church with 3.6 million members, supported large families way back in 2011. This was in response to a report by a committee which suggested penalising those with more than 2 children (from any religion). In fact one of the dioceses under SMC, even declared a cash prize of Rs 10000 for the fifth child.

    2. Dr Zakir Naik – No Need for Population Control
    Dr Zakir Naik, noted speaker on Islam, clearly says that family planning is not necessary since “Allah will take care of everyone”. Even on this facebook page, Zakir Naik makes it clear that “Family Planning is Haraam”. Arnab if you’re reading, pls stop this discrimination and have Dr Naik on your show as well!
    3. Thrissur archbishop Mar Andrews Thazhath: “Honour couples with more children”
    Way back in 2008, the Archbishop, in a letter read in churches in Kerala, reiterated the Church’s opposition to abortion. He also asked his church brethren to “honour couples with more children.”

    ReplyDelete
  33. Crooks within Media who day in day out debating Shakshi Maharaj and Sadhvi Parchi had neither debated nor will debate ever.

    1. Syro-Malabar Church – Kerala: Catholics should have 5 children
    The Syro-Malabar Church (SMC), apparently India’s largest church with 3.6 million members, supported large families way back in 2011. This was in response to a report by a committee which suggested penalising those with more than 2 children (from any religion). In fact one of the dioceses under SMC, even declared a cash prize of Rs 10000 for the fifth child.
    2. Dr Zakir Naik – No Need for Population Control
    Dr Zakir Naik, noted speaker on Islam, clearly says that family planning is not necessary since “Allah will take care of everyone”. Even on this facebook page, Zakir Naik makes it clear that “Family Planning is Haraam”. Arnab if you’re reading, pls stop this discrimination and have Dr Naik on your show as well!
    3. Thrissur archbishop Mar Andrews Thazhath: “Honour couples with more children”
    Way back in 2008, the Archbishop, in a letter read in churches in Kerala, reiterated the Church’s opposition to abortion. He also asked his church brethren to “honour couples with more children.”

    ReplyDelete
  34. Friends, i walked out of the cinema half way through the movie PK which could very well be an abbreviation for Pakistan it is very logical. If as a Christian i could feel offended by PK singularly targetting Hindus, their faith and faith leaders i wonder how much more an ordinary Hindu could have been offended. i can tell with my hand on my heart that the secular Jewish global media claims freedom of speech has no limits then these same secular Jews must explain why Holocaust Denial is a criminal offence in Belgium and Brussels the seat of the European Union. The secular Jewish media who supports Salman Rushdie and his Satanic Verses never tell us that Koran is indeed an Arabic translation of the Jewish Torah or the Five Books of Moses. Yes i'm telling you Moses asked in the Torah to kill infidels, idol worshipers, burn their colonies and seize their properties along with so many good things.

    ReplyDelete
  35. Now that you mentioned, so many movies and scenes come to mind, where the subtle message was, Muslims are better people than Hindus....more cultured, humble, sacrificing, truthful etc. Urdu is used by cultured people! I also remember all the trouble that the movie "Bombay" faced as it had a Muslim woman married to a Hindu man.

    It is sickening, the number of false equivalences that media feeds us, world-wide. BBC had a Muslim comedian pretend to mock Islam...however, what he actually mocked was some habits of Muslim people such as cruelty to animals, claiming excessive benefits and mistreating women. Nobody dared to question the fundamentals of Islam which allow, nay encourage this disgusting behaviour.

    They then equate things like Australians killing the aborigines to the Jehadi attacks. The most important difference between the two, being, the first is acknowledged as crime by everyone, while the second is called holy duty and encouraged by a major religion of the world.

    Whenever there is a Jihadi attack, the perpetrators never try to hide their identity or their intentions. In fact they declare their deeds with pride. We see these deeds praised by millions of "moderate" Muslims worldwide. The media brazenly tries to equate normal crime with Jihad!

    Then they ridicule any organisation that tries to work against this Islamic threat to the world. Judging by the articles in the western media about Modi, we now know how much to trust them!

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome and are not moderated so as to allow free speech. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.