Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Tolerance Is Over-Rated - Part 2

The spiritual roads to God or the “Power” that runs the universe are many. This is what Hindus believe and are taught. Hindus are also taught that all religions are the same. Many Hindus still chant this nonsense despite an abundance of evidence of it not being true. If all religions are the same, then followers of all religions must believe that. They don’t! The spirit of tolerance should be extended only when there is mutual respect between all religions. The time for mouthing such invalid, false philosophies like “all religions are the same” must be ended by Hindus.

There is a Mohammad Ali Road in Mumbai. It’s famous for its eateries and a delight for gluttony fans. There is one for him in Delhi too. During Eid this road in Mumbai also becomes an open Masjid where Muslims offer mass Namaz on the streets. It’s a phenomenon over the last two decades. Along with MK Gandhi he led the Khilafat movement in India. There are lots of things written about him but here is something he said about Gandhiji that you can ponder over: "However pure Gandhi's character may be, he must appear to me from the point of view of religion inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be without character. He repeated it later, saying, 'Yes, according to my religion and creed, I hold an adulterous and a fallen Muslim to be better than a Mr. Gandhi." Just imagine if a Hindu leader had said this about a Muslim leader. I can imagine your imagination running riot. And this was said about Gandhi who was far more sympathetic to Muslims than to Hindus.

The Sickulars are still reeling under the aftermath of the CharlieHebdo killings. They are at pains to find excuses to justify the actions of terrorists. From NDTV to The Hindu to a whole lot of Commie media the latest one to join the ranks is Outlook. Here’s an excerpt:

While I am all for free speech and all for satire, it must be said that Charlie Hebdo had it coming. That sounds crude and cruel, but Muslims would treat the cartoons as crude and deliberately provocative. And it won’t cut much ice with them if you tell them that the cartoons on the Pope were equally bad. You can lampoon Islam and its followers, as you can lampoon any other religion. You can even make fun of the Caliphs (arguably) but don’t touch the Prophet. Muhammad is no go area. His name is prefaced with ‘Prophet’ or with the appellation “peace be upon him” by his billion followers. You can’t paint him, sculpt him, or build a musical around him a la ‘Jesus Christ—Superstar.’ All that these caricaturists and satirists have to do is to leave one man alone. Not too much of a price to pay for peace, is it?”

Fantastic, isn’t it? It is one thing to argue that the Prophet is a “no go area” but a totally different thing to reiterate “Charlie Hebdo had it coming”. There are many ways to protest strongly but killing isn’t one of them. Had it coming, he says! There are other “no go areas” too and we will get into it shortly. All these scumbags who argue that CharlieHebdo had it coming are at a loss to answer a simple question. 59 people were roasted alive in a coach on a train in Gujarat in 2002. Did these people draw any cartoons? Did they even shout any anti-Muslim or anti-Islam slogans? But when the Hindus retaliated violently these very people claimed genocide, pogrom, state-sponsored violence etc. Seriously, did they expect that Hindus should simply continue to tolerate such unprovoked and unwarranted attacks? Since 2002 Gujarat has seen relative peace where communal relations are concerned. There have been stray incidents here and there but no major communal riots.

The man who wrote the Outlook article (Keki Daruwalla – is not a regular journo, but another Arundhati Roy types that infest Outlook) argues that not drawing the cartoons is a small price to pay for peace. 2002 happened before all these cartoons. And is the writer suggesting that prior to these cartoons the Islamists were peaceful and there was no terrorism? Did 9/11 happen because of cartoons? Did 26/11 happen because of cartoons? Did Madrid or London underground happen due to cartoons? Saif Rahman is an ex-Muslim of Pakistani origin in the UK. Here’s what he tweeted January 26:

It is an unfortunate but inevitable truth – Tolerance of intolerance doesn’t buy peace. It never has. Increasingly, we have only seen that retaliation (and often disproportionate retaliation) stands a better chance of buying peace. Ask the Japanese. Rahman has also written a book “The Islamist Delusion”. Do read the summary on the page I have linked. Rahman has drawn no cartoons of the Prophet but merely written a book criticising the practices of Muslims. He claims to have received 139 death-threats so far. What he summarises in his tweet as the 10 Islamist commandments is for our Sickulars to think about. Playing victim will not help anymore. What should now be clear is that after the Paris incident there are many who are making this absolutely clear to the extremists.

Bobby Jindal, the governor in an American state, was a darling for our media for quite a while as they claimed he was an Indian-American. He disappointed them recently by stating that he is only “American” and that his forefathers came to America to be Americans and not Indian-Americans. More stunningly, Jindal became the first politician to boldly state what many politicians were unwilling to say. Excerpts:

"Let's be honest here. Islam has a problem… Muslim leaders need to condemn anyone who commits these acts of violence and clearly state that these people are evil and are enemies of Islam. It's not enough to simply condemn violence, they must stand up and loudly proclaim that these people are not martyrs who will receive a reward in the afterlife, and rather they are murderers who are going to hell. If they refuse to do that, then they're part of the problem. There is no middle ground here”.

Jindal went on to add in his speech in the UK that some countries have allowed Muslims to establish autonomous neighbourhoods in cities where they govern by a harsh version of Islamic law. Yes indeed, UK is facing this problem and so are many other non-Islamic countries in the world. There are over 700 no go zones created by Muslims in France and though it is not authorised in any form, the police and other services dread to go to these zones. Norway has expelled over 5000 foreigners, mostly Muslims, as action for reducing crime in the country. In a rare departure, British PM David Cameron has finally issued a warning to mosques in Britain to rein in extremists:

Belgians in the Congo. France invaded Algeria for no genuine reason except greed and now Algerians are in large number in France. The Dutch were in South Africa and some other places to subdue the original inhabitants. The Portuguese were in Bombay, Goa and Diu. And there is hardly a country left that Britain had not invaded and colonised. It is very tempting to say “they had it coming”. But it’s not revenge that the Islamists are seeking. If that was the case they could have declared formal wars. But it is intolerance of the culture and systems of the host country while enjoying all its privileges that is causing the problems. This is true in India too. “No go area” said that dumb Outlook writer and that avoiding cartoons will buy peace. I have written before that there are many towns in India that are completely Islamised and are somewhat of a no go zone for non-Muslims. This has happened even in places considered particularly holy pilgrimage locations by Hindus. It is hard to believe this has happened in Rameshwaram:

It is understandable if one makes the mistake of thinking these no go zones are stray cases across the world, although increasingly common. It would help to pause for a minute and think that an entire community was thrown out Kashmir which is now a no go zone for India’s non-Muslims. Can any no go zone be worse than that? Had the authorities acted then or even a few months later the KPs could have returned to Kashmir. They are never going to return – no go zones are forever. No politician is going to be courageous enough to alter the situation. The challenge is to avert creating some more and for that unlimited tolerance has to disappear.

To be concluded

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Tolerance Is Over-Rated - Part 1

Stories of Prithviraj Chauhan’s bravery and valour fill many books in India. He was the king of Delhi. Also famous is the story of his elopement with Samyukta who would become his wife. The barbarian invader Mohammad Ghori was defeated by Chauhan and his army in 1191 as history tells us. A year later Ghori returned and defeated Chauhan and took over his kingdom. Chauhan was later killed by Ghori & Co under captivity. Soldiers’ code of honour often requires they treat their fallen enemy with honour. Prithviraj Chauhan let Ghori get away and did not pursue or kill him. If Ghori had been killed a good chunk of history may have been different. An army declaring war for some dispute or other is understandable. Ghori had no such known dispute except to invade, loot, rape and force Islam in Chauhan’s kingdom. There is a price to pay when you let barbarians get away. They don’t deserve honour, they don’t deserve a pardon. Even Jesus who preached kindness, peace and turning the other cheek ended up on the Cross.

Before and after Chauhan there were waves and waves of Islamic attacks on Indian provinces. Some were repelled, some conquered and some Hindu rulers also made peace with the invaders. Islamic warriors had butchered many and many other countries were fully turned Islamic – Persia, countries in Africa, Syria, the current state of Israel, Egypt, even Spain and parts of Europe and so on. Despite the invasion in India being the bloodiest the Hindus somehow refused to be totally conquered. Akbar’s general at Haldi Ghati was Rana Pratap’s relative. He refused to be conquered. Today, the Muslims in India, Pakistan and elsewhere claim they are the victims. The generally peaceful race of Indians, consisting of Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs, came to be known as tolerant because they withstood the barbarism of the invaders. Maybe they set a wrong precedence.

Cut to 20th century, Reginald Dyer, aka The Butcher of Jallianwallah Bagh, killed hundreds of innocent people. He wasn’t punished. He was celebrated as a hero in Britain. A classic appeasement of the Nazis was the 1938 agreement between British PM Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler, which allowed Germany to occupy Czechoslovakia. As Winston Churchill put it – that was hoping the crocodile would eat its appeaser the last. MK Gandhi wasn’t so much against violence as he was in support of non-violence, especially when it came to his own life. But MKG is commonly cited as the apostle of non-violence for only the Hindus to practically follow. This balderdash needs to be dispelled.  


Charlie Hebdo is now more known across the world that it was ever before, for obvious reasons. Following the terror attack and killing of a dozen people the Sickulars across the world have been groping for excuses to condone the attack. They suggest that religion must not be mocked and anyone who does will have to pay a price for it. Typically, the Indian media blacked out the CH images that caused offence. A couple of papers who reproduced the images willingly or accidentally had this to offer:

The cowards at “The Hindu” and “Mint” who brag about freedom of speech and all that suddenly got cold feet when it comes to Islamic cartoons. Everyone has learned by now that the Indian media’s idea of free speech is to abuse Hindus and Hinduism. Why? Because this lot is tolerant! The Hindus have historically given these Commies the idea that they will tolerate any crap thrown at them and have emboldened them to all kinds of nonsense. In the case of MF Hussain’s nude paintings of Hindu Goddesses all these Commies defended his right to freedom of expression. Many papers and magazines reproduced his porn. None withdrew or apologised. The Hindus didn’t kill Hussain. They just filed cases against him and even that is considered an attack on him by the Commies. The same Commies whined when Wendy Doniger’s anti-Hindu book was pulped by her publisher. The Hindus posed no physical or death-threat to her. It was some guy who filed a case and when it was certain that court would find Doniger’s book to be abusing Hinduism the publishers decided to dump it. What would it take for these wimps to acknowledge the truth? Here’s Malini P of The Hindu applauding the Pope for his stupid statement:

Richard Dawkins is a prominent atheist but even religious people who are sensible would find the Pope’s statement absurd. The Pope said “One cannot provoke, one cannot insult other people’s faith, one cannot make fun of faith” and that those who did “can expect a punch”. He jokingly added "If my good friend Dr. Gasbarri says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch”. That is as dumb as it can get and our media idiots are thrilled about it. Malini P, of the anti-Hindu paper, claims the Pope understands a “multicultural” world.  Really? Left to the Pope’s whims he would like the whole of India (and world) turn Catholic. Someone cursing a mother getting punched in return is the same as murdering a dozen people? We have a street-thug like Rajdeep Sardesai who roughed up a man for heckling him in retaliation to Rajdeep’s abuse. I have stated in “War on Hindus-3” that many towns in India have been completely Islamised. They are “no go” zones. In major cities we have Muslim ghettos which are avoided by others. Some Europeans and Americans are waking up to this reality in their own towns and cities. We shall see


We have now experienced how our media lies about events and stories. These Commie pimps are scared of Islamic terror as much as the Pope is. Fear is not unnatural but the media shows that they will trample upon you when they know will know you won’t hit back with violence and murder. English Defence League was formed in England to counter the Islamisation and the attacks by Muslim gangs on their soldiers, Jews and other random attacks. One of their founders was Tommy Robinson. He and his colleagues were on a charity march and here is the Channel4 report on an incident that happened during this walk in East London (0.42 mins):

The guy in the black T-shirt and dark glasses is Kevin Carroll of the EDL. The report mentions a clash with the guys in blue and red shirts and the image shows Kevin as the one who is offensive. Is that what really happened? People are now video-taping such events knowing what to expect of the media (and the impotent, cowardly Police). Here’s the part that Channel4 did not show its viewers (3.28 mins):

As the video shows, the guy in the blue shirt attacks Kevin who retaliates. The Police let the two guys walk away. They don’t arrest the attackers but instead arrest Robinson and Carroll. That’s Dhimmitude for you. Is it any different in India? Clearly, there is hardly any doubt that the two guys (in blue and red shirts) were planted by the police to provoke a conflict and create a “public disturbance” situation for which they can then arrest the EDL guys. And because the EDL guys protest the Islamic terror in their towns they are labelled Nazis, fascists and racists. Typical nonsense by “Sickular” thugs who label anyone who protests their crimes, with despicable names (full Robinson video on Youtube).

There have been thousands of terror attacks by Islamic forces over the years. Political and media cowards tried their best to wash the sins. It took the slaughter of cartoonists to wake up politicians to finally realise tolerance doesn’t pay. In this day and age, tolerance is increasingly the attribute of wimps and cowards. Tolerance is over-rated. More in the next part.

Friday, January 16, 2015

The War On Hindus - Part 4 #PopulationExplosion

At the recent Vibrant Gujarat meet, Narendra Modi reiterated his 3Ds statement: "India offers you 3Ds - democracy, demography and demand and it will not be found anywhere else in the world. We have large number of hands to work. And, we have even larger number of dreams to be realised”. Over thirty years ago a political satire reflected the brilliance behind terminologies. LDC (Less developed country), UDC (Under-developed country) and then we moved to “Developing country” and then to HRRC (Video 2.10 mins):

As Humphrey explains HRRC is “Human resource rich country” – Countries that are grossly over-populated and begging for money. India isn’t exactly holding out a begging bowl now but everyone seems to like the HRRC concept. Population controls don’t seem to work so let’s rejoice being over-populated. Every part of Modi’s statement is true but he appears to be left with no option but to see a problem as an opportunity – Population. A majority of our metros and other major cities have become too crowded and threaten a lot of social issues. Take a look at the unemployment statistics on this page. The percentage goes up and down but the absolute number of unemployed people keeps going up.

There is another chart at LiveMint which shows the socio-religious break of employment (you will need to zoom into the chart). It’s not hard to escape the fact that Muslims are among the lowest employed in the formal sector. This contrasts with the fact that their population keeps showing a positive growth rate. 2013-14 unemployment had gone up in rural areas despite the massive spend on MNREGA. Here’s what the population growth looks like over 60 years:

The figures till 2001 census are available but the 2011 figures appear to be estimates. The Hindu population has been steadily declining while the Muslim population has been growing. In some states like Bengal or Kerala the Muslim growth might be more pronounced but the latest data isn’t available. So what was all the fuss about Sakshi Maharaj advocating Hindu women to have more children (or 4 as he suggested)? Whether one likes the statement or not there is nothing criminal about it and it is just another opinion that has come from an individual. The media jerks kept asking the PM to condemn the Maharaj’s statement. I wonder why. After all, it is Modi who touched upon the growing Muslim population in 2002 with the phrase “Hum paanch, hamare pachees”. And because Sakshi Maharaj made that statement some media crooks exploit it by making silly statements like this one:

Epitome of a good Hindu? Choose a convenient equation and then claim because of the “good Hindu” conversion seems a good option. I wonder what Tavleen Singh thinks is a good Muslim – that guy Qureshi of BSP who announced a reward of 51 crores to the Charlie Hebdo killers? Ironically, Tavleen Singh’s partner was the late (Pakistani) Salman Taseer who, between two women, had seven children. So it is indeed surprising that she is so annoyed with someone suggesting 4 kids. Is the Maharaj the first? Not at all, here are two reports from Kerala (here and here):

Not only does the Church encourage having more kids but also offers cash incentives. Where were all these media morons and Opposition whiners when these incidents were happening? Obviously, all these happened while the glorious lady from Italy was in the saddle which allowed anything Christian to pass. There isn’t the slightest doubt that many parts in NE (in states like Nagaland or Mizoram) there has been near total Christianisation of the population. These states are far removed from the media glare on anything so the activities of the Conversion Mafia too pass without notice. There are parts of metros like Mumbai (Bandra, Andheri etc) which have become Muslim ghettos with migrants from various places. And nobody has their numbers and they probably don’t figure in any census reports either. Here’s what I had quoted in a previous post:

Mumbai population explosion (India Online): 29 lakhs (1901), 12.5 Million (1991), 18 Million (2006) and 21 Million (2011)
(Rediff on Bangladeshis): In terms of illegal immigrants in Mumbai, Bangladeshis alone account for between 3.5 lakhs according to a minister and 16.0 lakhs according to Kirit Somaya, a former MP.  What would you say about a government that can’t even get its numbers right on such matters? This is in no way to suggest that any of this population is involved in crimes but the possibilities that some may be cannot be discounted. But it sure is a matter of serious concern.

At a hotel in Chennai recently, I was surprised to find the room-boys speaking Hindi quite comfortably. They told me they had come from Assam but I have a feeling they are from Bangladesh. Many taxi drivers, domestics, maids in Delhi are reported to be from Bangladesh. Narendra Modi dared to promise during the LS campaign that illegals will be packed and sent back. Forget that, our cowardly govts don’t even dare to release the census figures of 2011 with the demographics. As much as there is a growth in Muslim population there is also a large Muslim population that is unaccounted. The Wall Street Journal in an article reflects how Muslim growth rate is outdoing Hindu growth rate. Actually, that’s not a correct statement. Hindus are registering a negative growth; a decline in population.

The excuse offered by the census official, in the WSJ article, for not releasing the 2011 figures is “too many elections” around. This is India, every six months there is some election around the corner. So, to counter this unchecked growth of Muslim population and the steady rise in absolute numbers of Christian conversions, if the Hindus talk about a “Ghar Wapsi” or more children the Sickulars are immediately up in arms. The anti-GharWapsi argument is even more deadly. The Muslims and Christians want the rights to convert others but anyone returning to Hinduism is objectionable and our politicians and idiotic media stand in support of this hypocrisy. What about the growth of Muslim population in the West? Here’s a chart that shows why Europe is in strife with Islamists:

France clearly has the highest Muslim population in Europe. The Charlie Hebdo attack was a bloody one but there have been frequent attacks on Jews and Jewish establishments in France by violent Muslims. Other countries with lesser Muslim population are also facing social strife even though the percentages appear small. The population invasion is not one to be taken lightly. The late Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi summed up future plans quite cleverly:

We have 50 million Muslims in Europe,” Gadhafi said. “There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe – without swords, without guns, without conquests. The 50 million Muslims of Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.”

In Europe the Christians are facing a negative population-growth while the Muslim population is increasing steadily. It’s not very different for Hindus in India who are facing a negative population-growth although they are still a huge number. Therefore, an anti-conversion bill is a must and is inevitable. The Chrislamist war on Hindus is fought on many fronts – Population is an important strategy and tactic. Imagine when they collectively reach 35-40% And that is not very unimaginable if the current situation continues.


Sunday, January 11, 2015

The War On Hindus - Part 3 #MultiprongedAttack

(This is a MaxiPost)

There are many ways a country can be invaded. An “invasion” is commonly associated with a Military invasion. There are other ways too – Politically, Commercially, Culturally, and Populationally. 


The first time the Americans encountered Islamic terrorism was way back around 1784. The Arabs (the Ottoman states of Tripoli, Tunis, Algiers and also Morocco) had a practice of demanding a “tribute” (call it Jaziya or Hafta) for safe passage of ships through the Mediterranean sea around them. Refusal to pay resulted in capture and enslavement of the ship crews by Islamic pirates followed by demands for ransom (Somali pirates are only the modern version).

In March 1785, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams went to London to negotiate with Tripoli's envoy, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman. When they enquired "concerning the ground of the pretensions to make war upon nations who had done them no injury", the ambassador replied:

It was written in their Koran, that all nations which had not acknowledged the Prophet were sinners, whom it was the right and duty of the faithful to plunder and enslave; and that every mussulman who was slain in this warfare was sure to go to paradise. He said, also, that the man who was the first to board a vessel had one slave over and above his share, and that when they sprang to the deck of an enemy's ship, every sailor held a dagger in each hand and a third in his mouth; which usually struck such terror into the foe that they cried out for quarter at once

Maybe Ambassador Abdrahaman was explaining the “root cause” that terror-apologists at NDTV, HeadlinesToday, TOI and G-37 specialists like Kiran Bedi are looking for. Later in 1801, then as President, Thomas Jefferson, refused to pay the Hafta and thus the first ever war by the US Navy was prosecuted against Islamic terrorism. It was also the first time US Navy came into international combat. It came to be known as the Barbary wars. The pirate states were defeated. Remember, Israel did not exist then. Oil wasn’t discovered in the Middle East till early 20th century, around 1908.


During the 1960s and till the mid-70s most of the romantic films and songs of Bollywood were usually made in Kashmir. There’s a movie from 1962 called “Hum Dono” which features the song “Allah tero naam, Ishwar tero naam” although I’m not sure the Muslims will agree with that. They believe Allah is only one and there is no other God or name for him. There are movies with no Muslim characters in it but would suddenly have a Qawali out of the blue. Mind you, Qawalis are very entertaining and enjoyable. There were many Muslims in Bollywood who had screen names, like Dilip Kumar and Johny Walker. We discovered they were Muslims only much later. But nothing wrong in screen names.

Then in the 70s and 80s guys like the late Feroze Khan, an average actor who became a better director, who would often play characters with names like Rajesh, Ramesh or Shankar (Check out his character’s names in most of his movies). But sometimes his movies would suddenly spring an Islamic song out of the blue. “Qurbani” directed by him suddenly springs up the song “Allah ko pyaari hai qurbani” in a very contrived context. So too “Jaanbaaz”, with the song “Allah ho Akbar”. These “Allah” songs are often inserted in movies as stand-alone numbers with no relevance to the story or context. That trend continues till today. But the different turn is that there are songs that demean Hindu icons as Sushma Swaraj once pointed and Gaurav Sawant reminds us:

Over the years Bollywood has consistently ridiculed and abused Hindu icons. Alright, if you want to make satires or ridicule icons you are welcome to it. But what is obvious is that the very same people refuse to expose the hilarious nonsense in other religions. It has almost become mandatory to have some item number or movies which portray Hindu icons in a vulgar fashion while the slightest negative portrayal of a Christian or Muslim icon invites extreme anger and violent reactions. The cowards at the Censor Board not only cave into such reactions but also pre-empt directors from ridiculing religions other than Hinduism. One such anti-Hindu Sicko is the current Chairperson of the CBFC, Leela Samson, a Jewish-Christian:

That thing about “… Malamaal” isn’t a stray case either. Jokes about Johny Lever’s name Abdullah made the Censor Board force the film-makers to change his name in the movie to Habibullah. They can’t even stand jokes about a name but they’re okay with ridiculing Shiva or Radha. I need not remind anyone about the violent agitations over “Vishwaroopam” by Kamal Haasan. And another movie that ridicules Christian priests has been blocked by the same Censor Board for over two years:

Wow! It’s been held back because it might hurt the Christian community. This might hurt Muslims that might hurt Christians but no problems with anything that offends Hindu sentiments. It is this hypocrisy that Hindus are now revolting against. Our media pimps like Barka, Sagarika, Rajdeep and Co. stand by these hypocritical morons of CBFC and claim they are all for freedom of expression. These pimps and the morons in various State and Central govts cannot tolerate any play or book about Nathuram Godse. Sure he killed Gandhi and he did so knowingly and willingly. He’s a murderer but what is so tolerant about all these morons that they cannot stand a play about him? And that is their idea of free speech? Sick slaves of Sickularism! So how does Bollywood abuse Hindus and Hinduism so daringly and get away with it? What’s their incentive?

The other phenomenon that can’t be missed – Since the late 1980s and early 90s there has been a great influx of Muslim actors in Bollywood and TV. There are Khans from Bollywood families and from outside too. If there’s a shortage, the producers import Muslims from Pakistan (like Nargis Fakri or Veena Malik). In principle, there is absolutely nothing wrong if a good number of talented Muslims get into movies and TV. But is that the only thing? Mahesh Bhatt converted to Muslim to marry a second woman and is now a prime-promoter of Islamic culture in Bollywood and a ubiquitous spokie for them. Is all this mere coincidence or incentivised? The cultural turn in Bollywood to abusing or ridiculing Hinduism alone (PK is only one of many such incidents) is an “invasion” that  shouldn’t go unnoticed. Many Muslim actors from here and there are included in a movie out of financing or coercion by the mafia; like that Monica of Abu Salem.


Many years after oil was discovered in the Middle East, OPEC was formed in 1960 with their HQ in Vienna, Austria. This is a Trade-Bloc or like a Cartel of oil-producing and exporting countries. From being barren desert regions, many ME countries suddenly grew wealthier and economically more influential. This time they had Israel as common enemy. So during the 1973 Egypt-Israel war the OPEC choked oil supplies to US and other countries and the prices dramatically soared due to the “rationing”. This embargo lasted a year resulting in inflation, recession and unemployment in many parts of the world. The Islamists realised their power and muscle. This was eventually combatted by alternate energy, other production sources and by 1980 the OPEC was in to an oil glut in the market. Prices dropped dramatically as they pumped out more oil than ever before. There was a deep impact on India too.

From the mid-70s onward lakhs of Indian labour migrated to ME to find jobs and earned better money than they did at home. They were exploited, their passports were seized, they could not follow their own religion, they could not strike. In short, they were turned into bonded slaves. Sheiks from the ME came to Hyderabad and Mumbai to shop for young girls to take back as slaves for their harems. The stories are too many and you can look them up. People sent home a lot of money, labourers returned home with two-in-ones in their hands and large bags of goodies. Parts of Kerala, like Cochin, had turned almost Dubai-like with Islamic influence. They went as labour but came back as Islamists. The Saudi Wahabis and others in the ME started investing in “Islamism” in India and her neighbours. Even countries like Sudan funded a rash of Madrassas – to amounts like 3000 crores. There are many towns in India which were completely Islamised with funds from ME. Bollywood too was no exception.

Since the mid-70s Petro-dollars have been funding Bollywood and simultaneously a new underworld, supported by certain politicians and ME funding, blossomed not only to control Bollywood but Mumbai itself. And it then extended to terrorism, cultural codes like Muslims who earlier wore dresses like anyone else adopted more Pathani dresses, skull caps and burqas. There was phenomenal growth of Mosques and Madrassas. If all that was only for educational upliftment of Muslims that would be one thing but it became an “assertive” Islamic culture which resulted in more and more demands and our Central and State govts fuelled this culture with more appeasements. Kashmir Pandits were thrown out of Kashmir. Kerala saw a dramatic Islamisation of the State. Bengal and Telangana are following the same routes. UP and Bihar became terror-hubs.


From the late 1970s and 80s onward the Islamic and Muslim influence in Bollywood and other forms of arts started seeping in. Prominent among the conflict with Hindus was the nude paintings of Hindu Gods and Goddesses by MF Hussain and artists at Commie hotbeds like JNU.

Those who are offering a veiled defence for the #CharlieHebdo (CH) killings by Muslim terrorists cannot stop defending the perverted portrayals of Hindu Goddesses by MFH. Goddess Saraswati is considered the icon of knowledge by Hindus. Vijaya Dashmi is celebrated by Hindus with a “Puja” of their weapons, implements, tools and books – whichever is the work-pursuit of the person. Why would a moron want to paint her nude? And those who find CH’s cartoons offensive continue to defend MFH’s nude paintings of Hindu Goddesses. The C5M even asks why a nude Saraswati can’t be done when Indian laws specifically prohibit such a religious offence. Our laws prohibit any form of nudity and obscenity for commercial purposes. Hindus treat Goddesses as mother. Let me be extremely harsh and blunt – Only the most perverted pimps like Sagarika, Barkha, Rajdeep and their Commie filth encourage such hypocritical nonsense. I believe the MFH defenders are either perverts who have seen or want to see their mothers having sex or bisexuals or lesbians who are aroused by such paintings. And these are the very scumbags who will scream about women being used as commodity and sex objects.

Their hypocrisy has no limits when it comes to offending Muslim sentiments. That’s Islamic money and fear talking and not a sense of fairness. Let’s see some more perverts and their cowardly hypocrisy:

It’s a common refrain. The movie PK which ridicules and abuses Lord Shiva in an attempt to portray fraudulent godmen is fine with them but CH cartoons are not. There are fraudulent godmen, fraudulent and violence-encouraging Mullahs and pedophile Christian priests but the only ones consistently being targeted by Bollywood and media are the Hindu ones. And that is what is arming the Islamic violence further. The fear of Muslims agitating and/or killing the “offenders” makes our Bollywood and media pimps wet their pants and skirts. In contrast, the worst perverts in the media, like street-thug Rajdeep, equate the protests against MFH to the CH killings. Another bimbo called Rana Ayyub of the dead Tehelka equates even protests against Praveen Swami to the killings of CH artists. And the best part is, both Rajdeep and Sagarika, India’s most moronic media-couple behave like they are the real victims of the CH killings.

What is the message these cowards are sending? That unless Hindus too arm themselves and kill those who offend their religious sentiments it is okay to offend Hinduism, Hindu Gods and Goddesses and Hindus in general? MFH wasn’t killed. The cowardly Hindu-abuser ran from the Courts of India to a desert and died there. Maybe it’s nature’s retribution that he didn’t deserve to die in the holy soil of India which many ordinary people are blessed with the fortune to.


If all that wasn’t enough, here’s the High-Pimptress of Hypocrisy and cheerleader of Pakistan and the anti-Hindu brigade in media:

As Rana Ayyub points out? I can’t help rolling over in laughter. This is Salma quoting Sabrina to somehow slam France in a twisted defence of the CH killings. The bimbo further goes on to slam France for practicing dual-standards of free speech. I wonder if she ever looks in her bathroom mirror at the face of hypocrisy and dual standards. First, France wasn’t the first country to ban protests. In fact France was one of the earliest victims of Palestinian terrorism (remember the AirFrance plane hijacked to Entebbe in 1976?).  France was the first country to impose an arms embargo on Israel after the 1967 war with Egypt to appease Muslims and Palestinians. Secondly, France is the country that housed the known fundamentalist Ayatollah Khomeini for ages before he returned to Iran and pronounced a death-fatwa on Barkha’s permanent darling Salman Rushdie. For both these Moronginis, Barkha and bimbo Ayyub, someone has specially written an article on how Muslim appeasement is making France pay a price. May be they should read and educate themselves because India has been paying this price for over 60 years and the cost of appeasement will only go higher.

After the CH killings there were Sickos on NDTV like Kiran Bedi and their anchors and some on Headlines Today who were still discussing the “root cause” nonsense. Street-thug Rajdeep called Taslima Nasreen for a discussion on CH killings. She slammed Islamic terrorists and she slammed cowardly hypocrites so much that he suddenly cut off the show to move to a breaking-news that wasn’t really urgent. I think I have fairly explained the “root cause” of Islamic violence, earlier in this post, which caused the Barbary wars.

The Chrislamist invasion and attack on Hindus follows multiple paths – Weaponry (through terrorism), Culturally, Politically and Commercially. Who’s the target? Hindus! Anything I left out? Oh yes, Populationally! We will deal with that in the concluding part of this series.