If you haven’t already, please read the previous part: “Rajdeep reveals his ugly character at NY” and also “A question of Aroon Purie’s ethics & morals”.
Contrary to what a hack grandly claimed after Rajdeep Sardesai’s ugly Madison Square Garden incident, self-styled journalists do not have any Constitutional right to ask “obnoxious” questions. This dangerous assumption has been used to spew hatred on a certain segment of people by our MSM. This hatred had to inevitably result in the physical assault of a person that Rajdeep is guilty of. These sickos in our MSM have no business to talk about freedom or liberty. Wise men have long ago left this wisdom behind: “The liberty to swing your arm ends where another man’s nose begins”.
After the incident some Aaptards, led by you know who, put out part videos of RS being manhandled. Little did these idiots know that in this day and age anybody and everybody with a mobile phone is almost a citizen-journalist. But predictably, the “Box of parrots” that forms our MSM went on a rant about how RS was abused and assaulted. I have screenshots but to save space let’s summarise the initial morons:
These unworthies now have eggs on their faces. This is nothing short of a choreographed operation to make RS a “victim” of a “mob” as these scoundrels refer to the people who had come to hear PM Modi. All the evidences and videos have already been put up in the previous posts I referred to at the beginning. The question now is, what did Rajdeep do after the incident that drove this choreographed operation of #IStandWithRajdeep? Let’s read his “regret” which he published on October 10 (excerpts):
“However, I do believe it is important to put events of the day in context. I along with my camera person was outside Madison Square garden about three hours before the prime minister was to arrive. Our aim was to capture the mood, which was joyous and excited. We were able to reflect much of this in our coverage… I was abused in terribly foul terms, my family was called names and I was kicked in the shins when my back was turned. The pushing and jostling continued even as I tried not to engage. I had gone to the event with hopes of goodwill instead the volley of name calling was unrelenting and shocking to me. My camera person and other witnesses would bear testimony to this… I do, however, believe that surrounding, heckling and hurling vicious personalized abuse while a journalist is doing a professional job is also unacceptable. We journalists have a challenging job at the best of times and only ask to be allowed to perform our duties unhindered without intimidation… The freedom of the press is an integral part of our democracy and should be respected by all”.
Rajdeep uses all the balderdash in the world to defend his abuses and stupid behaviour. As a professional, if you’re heckled, you just walk away. You just find another spot to report from. The videos clearly show what this scoundrel was intent on doing: Inviting soundbites against Modi that will tar the PM and throw a sour note to the event. He was fishing for filth. RS claims he had his cameraman with him. What was that cameraman doing? Peeling onions? This is what RS tweeted:
A) If you got the “idiots on cam” where’s the video? B) It’s not that “mob” that released a “selective” video. It’s Rajdeep’s Aaptards who released a selective video. Fact: Rajdeep does have a video that his cameraman may have shot but unfortunately that video DOES NOT have any abuse or violence from people. C) The full video which starts with Rajdeep turning back and assaulting Mr. Yellow Kurta was put up only after the “selective” video was put out by Aaptards.
RS represents a TV channel with a full crew but can’t put up a video to back his stupid claims? That’s the character that Rajdeep is and that is why his regret or apology is a mop-up operation that won’t pass. But the lies didn’t last long after the full video came up and that is why Rajdeep now tries to claim he was abused, his son was abused, all without the slightest shred of evidence. That calls for an estimate of what Rajdeep did after the incident, doesn’t it?
Fact seems to be that the truncated video was indeed passed on to “very senior Aaptards” by Rajdeep himself or his crew. The Aaptards put up the selective video and the boss sends a message to all his fellow Aaptards who then trend #IStandWithRajdeep. It’s based on this LIE that all the morons in the media started making him a “victim”. How do I know? Well, a very “Senior Bird” from Delhi called me up a few days ago to tell me the whole story. This Bird & Co. also had interactions with Rajdeep immediately after the incident. As soon as he went to his hotel, or wherever he went after the incident, Rajdeep probably realised that he had screwed up unforgivably. Once the heat of the moment was gone, his cold sweat probably caused him to realise his blunder. So what does he do? He calls up all members of the HATO (Hammam Associates Treaty Organisation). That’s a lot like the NATO you know. The job of this HATO is to protect their mafia member no matter what. That’s why Namita Bhandare foolishly rants “Assault of one journalist is assault on entire press”. Bravo! By the same logic, rape by Tejpal would also make the entire press a mafia of rapists. Wouldn’t it? That’s what someone reminded her:
And Namita Bhandare enters into long baseline rallies with another journo pointing to eyewitness accounts. Really? Eyewitness? In this age of candid camera? And she demands the “Union of snakes” which also passes by the name of Editors Guild must seek an apology from the organisers of the MSG event. Oh well, she quotes the eyewitness account’s narration. Here:
Well, well! As soon as the truth came out, the “eyewitness account” of Mistresses like Namita Bhandare disappeared. This moron who tends to blabber a lot about right-wing didn’t pause to think for herself. She was led like a babe in the woods to the stupidity she came to deliver on behalf of Rajdeep. After all, member of HATO, eh? As for eyewitnesses, Ashok Shrivastav of DD was also an eyewitness and he didn’t disappear or withdraw like Namita’s punk on FB. So, Rajdeep called up many of his HATO members to paint him a victim and they gladly obliged without a second thought or without any fact-checking. That’s what the criminal attempted – a black-wash of his crimes. You would have thought that Rajdeep who so bragged about “Citizen Journalism” while with CNN-IBN forgot that these same citizen journalists abound everywhere to screw his lies. If a legal authority were to scan the phone call records of Rajdeep from that day it would bear out what I have stated.
Next, Rajdeep runs into Gautam Adani in some restaurant and narrates his sob story. He tells him how he was abused and molested by the “mob” (Of the Gambino or Modino family?). Adani probably said he sympathises and any leader would condemn such incidents. Of course, you can safely assume Adani wouldn’t have seen or heard anything other than the sob story of Rajdeep. So Rajdeep gets a call from Sheela Bhatt (or maybe he called her to deliver another Salma story) and he tells her how Adani mentioned Modi was upset with the “mob’s” behaviour. Promptly, Sheela Bhatt runs a story on her Rediff pages with the headline “Modi upset over attack on Rajdeep Sardesai”. All this, when Modi would have probably have never even heard of the incidents in his busy schedule. And why would Modi even bother with the silly drama of Rajdeep? Even this lie could not run its course because Adani issued a clear denial of any such communication. So basically Rajdeep and Sheela Bhatt were doing their “Salma-Sabrina” act. Pathetic LIARS!
In summary, the fake stories of abuse, assault on him etc. were placed in the social media by none other than Rajdeep himself. He used his Hammam, senior Aaptards and gullible people like Sheela Bhatt to spread his victimhood. There isn’t a single piece of evidence that he was abused (except in retaliation) or physically assaulted. All the video-evidence points to Rajdeep being the criminal. And that is that! Rajdeep is also lucky Mr Yellow Kurta didn’t file a police complaint for assault, else he would have cooled his heels in a cold cell and still be in the US on bail.
After Wimbledon this year Maria Sharapova blurted out she hadn’t heard of Sachin Tendulkar. That was enough to send thousands of his fans on a rampage. Sharapova was ridiculed, abused all over the social media and cartoons abounded on the MSM. Why would you go to a public event of PM Modi and deliberately abuse and provoke those who came to hear him? Why would you call them a “mob”? Would you call people assembled for an SRK show a mob? Would you call those attending Sonia’s rally a mob? All this is mindless hatred that Rajdeep and others in the MSM have nurtured. It culminated in his violent behaviour. The only mafia “mob” I see is lumpens from the MSM who spread lies and abuse people because they support Modi. You don’t shout “Fire” in a crowded theatre. Rajdeep and his entire Hammam now stand naked in front of you.
Tailpiece: To the bimbo who claimed journalists have the right to ask “obnoxious” questions my only warning is to expect “obnoxious” answers. There’s a video floating on Facebook about a similar obnoxious behaviour by a reporter. She epitomises what Rajdeep did at MSG. The street guys responded with far more maturity.
Telling people “You have money but have no class… Did Modi teach you this?... You American-Indians have no values” is nothing short of racist behaviour by Rajdeep. And these are the bimbos to teach us freedom of press and democracy?