Friday, July 26, 2013

The Batla House Deception



Yesterday evening, after the Batla Encounter verdict, Congress spokie Abhishek Singhvi came out and stated the verdict should not be politicised. Ahem! He demonstrated the hypocrisy of his party like no one else could have done. For 5 years some Congressmen have done nothing but politicise it. Digvijaya Singh called the encounter fake many times and even visited Azamgarh to rake up the issue politically. Salman Khurshid during the UP 2012 campaign said there were tears in SoniaG’s eyes on seeing Batla House images. All of them thoughtlessly tarred the reputation of a police officer, Mohan Chand Sharma, who was killed in the encounter. This continued even after former Home Minister P. Chidambaram maintained the encounter was not fake and even NHRC (National Human Rights Commission) shared their agreement on it.

So let me lay out the story which I presume the hacktivists and professional agitators would have us believe. On the fine morning of September 19, 2008 Mohan Sharma and members of his Special Unit were at their station chatting over tea. For days they were idle with nothing much to do. One wiseguy suggested “why don’t we go kill some people, we need to test our guns”. Another guy said “we haven’t got medals for a long time it’s time we did something”. So they wrote the names of 5 localities with some addresses in pieces of paper and one of them picked the lucky draw. Well, the unlucky winner in the draw was ‘108 Batla House’. So the guys strapped their guns in the holsters and drove up to Batla and stared shooting and killed a few and some escaped. They were smart not to arouse suspicion this was a fake encounter. So Mohan Sharma took his gun, stretched and turned his arm 180 degrees and shot himself in the back; twice. This is the story the hacktivists would have you believe. The only change they offer is that another cop shot Sharma. So you have two options on how Sharma died.

I remember a scene from the movie “Analyse That” where the shrink asks the mafia wiseguy how he got out of jail and what happened to the strong witness. The wiseguy explains to him: “Oh the witness, he was frustrated… he stabbed himself in the back, twice, and then threw himself over a bridge into a river”. Yeah, frustrated people do stab themselves in their own back, not once but twice, and jump off a bridge. Quite plausible, isn’t it?

Arnab Goswami, in his usual style, let out a tirade against certain Human Rights hacktivists on their wrongful defence of potential and actual terrorists who shot dead a cop. On Times Now Ravi Shankar Prasad made an important and startling comment. He stated that some Delhi cops of the special unit mentioned to him that if Mohan Sharma hadn’t died they would have all been in jail because of the highly connected HR hacks claiming fake encounter and the Jamia Milia agitators. Does that shock anyone? It is probably true if you can see shades of the Ishrat case where the cops are in jail or on bail. Yes, if Mohan Sharma hadn’t died the cops would have been charged for a fake encounter by certain activists, bounty-hunting lawyers and political bitches. That is the level and reality of how the Congress-UPA has brought the country’s fight against terrorists. And they’ll scream “don’t politicise” when they have egg on their faces. It’s a very dangerous sign.

NDTV, true to their profession, were asking if encounters were justified and if the Batla verdict would impact other encounter cases pending in courts. This was a programme by Sunetra Chaudhury in the evening on July 25. What particular case could NDTV be referring to? Umm… Let’s see! If I were to make a wild guess I’d say the Ishrat case on which another political campaign of the Congress and assorted hacktivists rests heavily. The Ishrat verdict is not likely to come any time soon so Singhvi can hold the “don’t politicise” Ishrat verdict for the future. On TimesNow a certain Mrs. Ramalingam, another of those HR hacks, screamed “What about the rights of the common man”? Well, even if there are police raids I wonder if common men pull out guns and start shooting. I tweeted stating I would rather see people like Shahzad dead. They are not common by any stretch of imagination. If terrorists shoot and are caught the courts exist to deliver justice and it doesn’t go by the frivolous opinions of these HR morons.

Now, since the verdict held Shahzad, the lone captured terrorist, guilty of killing Sharma the hacktivists and his lawyers started a new tune. They claimed the court did not judge him as an IM (Indian Mujahideen) terrorist nor has it judged the encounter to be genuine. Okay, weeping venals, we will get to that part soon! There is something shocking that I learned only yesterday. It seems ANHAD (Act now for harmony & Democracy) the NGO run by Shabnam Hashmi and Harsh Mandar had filed a petition in the SC through lawyer Prashant Bhushan to seek a judicial probe as the Batla encounter was against a particular “Community”. Wow! So hate-engineer Shabnam Hashmi thought terrorists shouldn’t be countered if they are from a particular community. The SC naturally dismissed this bogus petition and even admonished the gang for trying to link the case to a particular community. They didn’t say it and the SC didn’t say it but ANHAD is clearly implying the Muslim community is being victimised. I call ANHAD: “Act now for hatred and disharmony” and I make no bones about it.

Now that the verdict is out the hacks, the defence lawyers and sundry agitators from Jamia Milia claim the court had neither judged Shahzad to be an IM terrorist nor has it called the encounter genuine. This is the deception that they are peddling to fool the nation. Here are a couple of tweets that @Spread_Law made on the case:

Mind you, I am only quoting SpreadLaw, a helpful handle which tweets on legal issues and provides clarity on judgements, and it is not part of any debate or controversy in the Batla case. So the question is why would a court pass a judgement on whether Shahzad is an IM, LeT or JuD terrorist when there was no such specific petition and no one asked the court for such a judgement? The case before the court was whether Shahzad killed Mohan Sharma in the encounter and the circumstances leading to it and not the flavour of his terrorist connections. Secondly, there was no petition in the court challenging the genuineness of the encounter except probably in the defence of Shahzad by his lawyers, so the court also did not have to adjudicate on that. The murder of the cop was the key issue in the prosecution. So the claims that the court did not pass judgement on these issues are frivolous and meant to deceive the public. Fact is there was no legal challenge on the encounter being genuine and therefore the court does not need to rule on it.

Courts usually rule on the petition before them. They don’t have to rule on petitions that were never made. And until someone specifically challenges Batla as fake, as the hacks have done in the Ishrat case, the encounter will stand as genuine. Period! As SpreadLaw points out, the court has made an “observation” which is substantial but even that was not necessary. Shahzad is indeed a terrorist of IM and the encounter is genuine unless someone legally challenges that position. If Digvijaya Singh felt the encounter was fake he and his gang should have challenged it in the courts. They did not because they too know there is no merit in their claim which is only for “political” gains.

The fake claims of the hacktivists are equivalent to claiming Al Capone was never a bootlegger and never a murderer because no court has ever pronounced him so. He was sentenced to prison for tax evasion which is the case the prosecution brought against him. That’s the nature of law. But everyone knows Capone was a mass murderer and a bootlegger. The campaign of lies and deception by the HR hacks and some politicians is not out of any sympathy for the likes of Shahzad. It is a larger design to weaken the country politically and compromise its security for enemy forces. These people and their deceptions are as dangerous as the terrorists themselves. 

54 comments :

  1. A Muslim's song about Congress and other Muslim vote bank pandering parties (sung to the tune of famous "Intezaar" song from Sharaabi) after being had for the nth time:

    Istemaal ho gayi, humri vote ki
    Aayina kuch khabar, development ki
    Woh hamein tha yakein, bewaafa woh nahin
    Phir wajah kya hui, backwardness ki

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow..column is good song is best!!

      Delete
    2. Did you publish this on Twitter? If you want, I can.
      Any Muslim sees and understands this will not vote for Cong and other SICKUALAR parties.

      Delete
    3. Please go ahead. We have to awaken all right-thinking Indians, including Muslims. The family and the party has to go.

      Delete
    4. @Shashi Patil

      I just posted on twitter here:
      https://twitter.com/RPrasad_7/status/361156802630524928
      https://twitter.com/RPrasad_7/status/361159041034108932

      I fully agree, the family's party must end at the expense of India and Indians.

      Delete
  2. Another incisive post.
    The squirmy answers of Singhvi yesterday were so slimy - about Digvijay Singh and Salman Khurshid apologizing.
    Shabnam Hashmi - the less said the better.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Only Arnab appeared credible and genuine with his forceful points and completely exposed the HR traitors.This is the difference b/w a great patriot AG and Barkas&Rajdeeps of media.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think while Bakra dutt and beaf eater/numero uno team are totally sold out, Arnab perhaps has a limited contract with KhanChris.Something like I will defend you one in three cases.His last project was the Puppy and Hindu Nationalist issue where he behaved worse than the pioneers in the trade.

      Delete
    2. Yesterday Burkha team was busy in second round of interview with Sen. Since congress is clearly on back foot for few days now,if this continues they may plan for third round of interview with him so that they can avoid embarrassment for Congress.

      Delete
    3. AG has destroy congress on Rs5.I gotta say Times now is doing gr8 service to the nation.but sometimes they behave like slaves. that is most unfortunate part. I hope Arnab will continue fucking congress and Sanjay Jhatu.

      Delete
    4. I sometimes feel that Sanjay Jha is a mole planted by BJP.The way he is undermining the KhanChris everyday,anyone will be tempted to think so. If he continues in the same vain,it may not be necessary for BJP or Modi to campaign.

      Delete
    5. Perhaps Times Now(Times Group) is compensating for NaMo "Rambo Act" the lie they peddled. Now they want to gain credibility again.

      Delete
  4. I think congress was caught in its own game. 2009 verdict gave them the hope that it may finish off RSS/BJP in religious perception. Congress was successful in changing the narrative by including 'Hindu' terror angle in perception. But the continuous terror attacks and conviction of Muslims has allowed BJP to gain strength.
    No filing of chargesheet, till date on Sadhvi Pragya is making congis nervous now.
    All the comments on muslim victimhood for atrocities of their own state police is going to blow up on their faces.
    In eagerness of finishing off BJP, they will find themselves in real bad situation after 2014. They can just wish/hope/pray Modi doesnot become PM. Others can be managed. If Modi puts the efforts which was done to finish him politically, he can finish of whole first family and by extension congress.
    Game has just begun.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Let's hope Modi pays them back with interest. I still believe the biggest blunder committed by Vajpayee was to let the congees go lose, there was no political witch hunt after BJP came to power.

      Delete
    2. My friend, you just took the words right out of my mouth. Modi has trapped them n cornered them in UP. By bringing up CONgs track record on secularism, media r forced to question them. Burqa of secularism is a truly valid point. Y should any1pander to Muslim community like this n call themselves secular? Its laughable. Not1person even in BJP dared question this skew except Modi.
      CONg hoping that it can keep communalising country n calling
      BJP communal! Laughable. This bogey of secularism, communalism shld die n EQUALITY restored for TRUE SECULARISM. Only Modi can put dynasty where it belongs. In history.

      Delete
  5. below the belt hit. Now it will hurt them more then ever.

    ReplyDelete
  6. lage raho dost, 4 din ki jindagi hai, kyo na lad ke maren. may god give u strength to take on hordes of antinationals

    ReplyDelete
  7. Please do not insult canines by calling crooked and scum filled females as political bitches. Canines are trustworthy and the most affectionate creation of God.

    What about crooked and scum-filled males? Doesn't one high ranking Congress leader falls in that category too?

    ReplyDelete
  8. These HR hacks always say What about common people... Let me share an incident that took place in Chennai last year. A gang of bank robbers were killed in an fierce encounter by TN Police in a residential area. From the next day onwards for many days, there was a long line of Common people at Police commissioners office to thank him for killing these robbers and ensuring their safety. Few days back TN high court in its ruling admonished these HR hacks for calling this encounter fake. Common people want their safety.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Spot on and great one as usual. Why Mr. Digvijay Singh has not commented yet?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Why Batla House can be Fake: Post-mortem report confirms Atif, Sajid were hit by blunt force http://twocircles.net/2010mar17/batla_house_post_mortem_report_confirms_atif_sajid_were_hit_blunt_force.html?sms_ss=twitter&at_xt=51f20666c388cdb9,0 via @AddThis

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Friend, pls dont blindly take up a cause bcos a Muslim was involved. Any1 can make mistakes, including Hindus. So, pls dont extend support blindly, to a group of terrorists. If the court has found him guilty, so be it. Just bcos there were anti-mortem injuries doesnt mean the encounter is fake!

      Delete
    2. Just getting hit by blunt force itself proves this encounter is fake? There is a lot of scuffle that could have happened there. Neither you or I were at the SoE, so how are you so sure it was fake? Just because he was from the same community?

      Delete
    3. The fact that Sadhvi is still not chargesheeted or prosecuted should be a case as to why Javed's of India do not question cases other than their community. While Mukhul Sinhas question Ishrat cases too?
      Do you think the honorable court had not got into the evidence before pronouncing it. We hear everyday of the liberal muslims, but all we see on the political discourse is people like the above disrespecting the courts whenever the judgement does not meet their expectations.

      Delete
  11. Truly amazed at the way you gather facts and present them.Do keep up the goodwork.Iam trying to spread the word about your site wherever possible so people would wise up to the current political drama going on.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I just don't understand the muslim community, they still believe CON party is their saviour and will get them out of the morass they are in. They still don't realise they are being used and will be continued to be used till they die and then the next generation will be sold the same story and continued to be used by the CON party. It's not only them their are others also who gets used and thrown away like a tissue paper. A recent case is that Sanjiv Bhatt and his wife Shweta Bhatt. Does anyone remember them today. CON party used them for a limited purpose and today he and his family simply cease to exist for the CON party. Sooner the muslims realise this its better for them and let them be assured this country will exist only as a secular nation and nothing else as from time immemorial this country existed only as an open and secular society. That's why even the emergency couldn't last more than 2 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dear Natraj,

      A majority of Muslim community is deliberately kept absymally poor & uneducated so that they can utilize them for planted jihad, rioting & voting psedosecular parties. The Muslim religious & political leadership is completely soldout to Congress & other sicular parties. Only someone like NAMO shows them a glimpse in Gujarat of what true secularism & development means without using them as a votebank.

      Delete
    2. Do not keep hopes for educated also. Read or see "Not without my Daughter." German resident Afgan Muslim Doctor turns a jihadist and terrorist after entering Afghanistan and meeting his family.

      Delete
    3. Problem is Muslims vote(even the educated ones) according to what their local Imams say...And what do Imams want??? They want Muslim Umma in India??? How do u get it??? By taking baby steps....like breeding like rats so that their population overtakes that of Hindus(Cong wont enact the 2 child per couple policy ever) , by killing Hindu leaders , rioting at will(Cong goes soft on any Muslim crime)...

      So cong is helping Ms in a great way to islamise India...Why wouldnt the Ms want this....One of Muslims unfinished project , since Mughal times is to convert india into Pakistan....

      Delete
  13. Bang on Ravinar, 100% true words 'It is a larger design to weaken the country politically and compromise its security for enemy forces' by the HR hacks and their likes. If each and every action of the law enforcing agencies against our nation's fight for terrorism have to see the days in courts of law then God only can save this nation. Like AFSPA, counter terrorism cells/units of Police forces / IB have to be provided with some immunity that would boost their morale in the fight against terrorism. At the same time there need to be some checks and balances to prevent innocents getting killed.

    ReplyDelete
  14. In the movie Jack Reacher starring Tom Cruise , a sniper of US army is wrongly accused of shooting 5 people randomly since he was idle for 2 years in the job, so he tried to test his gun and his shooting skills.

    ReplyDelete
  15. http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/newdelhi/Delhi-Batla-House-encounter-accused-Shehzad-held-guilty-of-murdering-cop/Article1-1098112.aspx --------------- can anyone here vote in the blackbox there on the site HT has somehow found out how to brain drain by outsourcing this polldaddy feature on its gullible readers.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Dear Ravi - was expecting it to come and it feels good when you want something and it is delivered.

    Loved - ANHAD: “Act now for hatred and disharmony” - BJP should corner Khangress and show how Shabnam Hashmi was running her operations from Syeda Hameed's house, of Harsh Mander and of Prashant Bhushan and other NAC cronies. Let people know of NAC and its chairperson SG.

    BJP needs to up the ante big time.

    Yesterday saw one old video of Pramod Mahajan speaking in Parliament on Confidence Motion of Deve Gowda when Congress withdrew support. Great one

    BJP needs someone like him to take things head-on !!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Wow.. that's another revelation about Hashmi's office of operations! Not surprising, but good to know that such things are coming out in the open and are also being shared with the people interested in knowing the truth behind all this NGO charade.

      Delete
  17. Posting with a few correction.
    People of Batla House area protested against the court verdict. The terrorists killed in the encounter and the one arrested are/were not from that area, they are from the notorious town Azamgarh. Why this affinity? Muslim brotherhood? Even if they are terrorists? I think we need to start questioning such common-cause breast openly. The question I want to ask such people and their supporters in Human Rights Industry, most of whom are Hindus: Can love for the country be conditional? Of course these people are not even at the step before love,called loyalty. Can loyalty to the nation be with, "conditions apply"? All nationalists should start openly questioning and confronting these "conditional loyalists" of India more aggressively.

    ReplyDelete
  18. All the BJP spokespersons coming on Media should be made mandatory to read the blogs of Mediacrooks, Niti Central and CRI. Excellent work MC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Center Right India. Excellent folks. Pls follow @prasannavishy

      Delete
  19. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  20. A request to all commenters...

    This blog is read from school/college students to elder citizens. Please ABSOLUTELY AVOID USE OF EXPLETIVES IN COMMENTS. Expletives and foul language are not required to make a point.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  21. `It is a larger design to weaken the country politically and compromise its security for enemy forces. These people and their deceptions are as dangerous as the terrorists themselves.' You have aptly explained the state of affairs in our country. From the times of Indira Gandhi congress always tried to weaken the country to be in power. In the times of Soniaji this policy of putting country`s interest at stake for political gains has following with much vigor. Foreign forces like US have giving enough support to Congress to implement this policy.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Wow what a country where every terrorist is considered martyr and every martyr is considered murderer... Where politicians can stoop down to any level. Sonia can cry for batla house encounter n mite hv cried on kasabs, azmal deaths as well for votes.
    Those who try to divide country in the name of religion can't be our leaders.
    I remember these lines...
    “Buzdilon ke ishq mein, shaida mujhe kyon kar kiya. Is namard desh mein paida mujhe kyon kar kiya''.

    When men of courage begin to say this, all hope will die. No people who treat their heroes as we have done can expect to survive.
    K P S Gill

    Still lets hope that this situation will change soon.......

    ReplyDelete
  23. Great post again, Ravi, with quite a few revelations. The real game of these unworthy elements has started becoming extremely obvious and open now.
    I am just curious to find out when exactly did Hashmi and co. submit their petition? Please let us know if you do.
    The timing seems to play an important role in all such acts. A couple of days back, Vrinda Grover was strongly arguing with Mahesh Jethmalani about the Ghazwa Times having withdrawn its certificate to IJR from its website on 28th of July 2004, and not three years later, in 2007. She was trying to prove that the LeT mouthpiece did not do this to make it convenient for Javed Sheikh's Dad Mr. Pillai's plea about the fake encounter, which was filed probably in 2007. A little search revealed that if VG is right about the date, it perfectly suits to help IJR's mom's plea about a judicial inquiry that was done in July 2004, just a few days before the vociferously stressed date!

    ReplyDelete
  24. Batla House Encounter Verdict is the single most weapon that destroyed SECULAR and traitor duo of Congress and AAP. Nationalist Hindus and Muslims will not vote for them now.

    For AAP to appeal to Indians again, Arvind Kejriwal must apologize to the nation and they must also expel Prashant Bhushan for anti-national and pro-Terrorist activities. Since both of these are unlikely, AAP's story is finished here.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Good, relevant and precise---

    Rahul Gandhi and Narendra Modi, happen to be lost in a desert. After days of walking without any water or food, they noticed a Mosque.

    Rahul said: "I will walk in saying that my name is Mohamed, and you say that your name is Ahmed, this way we'll get some food! I have done this before too.we can easily fool them.

    Deal?"

    Modi: "No, I am a Hindu Nationalist.I won't change my name I will stick with my name."

    They walked in.

    Maulavi asked who are you?

    Rahul Gandhi: "My name is Mohamed."

    Modi: "I'm Narendra Damodardas Modi."

    Maulavi: "Modiji ko pani dijiye aur khana khilayiye aur (Bring water and food for Modiji and) Mohamed Miya, Ramazan Mubarak".....

    ReplyDelete
  26. I am not supporter of any group, but looking at the political influence over investigating agencies and limited scope for judiciary over investigation, I feel all the cases from 1984 riots, like of Mulayam DA case, or Ishrat or this batla,Salman Hit-run This alll cases are investigated only to give advantage to Congress(ruling Govt), Recently Bansal was not chargesheeted by CBI,who is ready made clean chit for Mulayam too.... what is credibility of any investigation in any case??? when politics are run by traitors,who preside over all investigation agency, similarly talking about this case, It may look to be in favor of police or someone else.. but certainly some congress leader is getting benefited by this verdict.. Then Why Only focus is on Gujarat encounter(8) and not on UP encounters(132)? why till date from independence of 3 ministers were punished? Is there no corruption here? So I doubt 90% of investigation involving ruling party..

    ReplyDelete
  27. There is one more racket going on TV channels with all these farcical election surveys. The latest one is congress-communist 'jugalbandi' (CNN-IBN and The Hindu).

    The congress seemingly in the last attempt to stay in the race, is throwing out taxpayers' money to the media and to the schemes like food-security bill etc..

    ReplyDelete
  28. India: A train running towards disaster where passengers are sleeping, driver is blind, signalman is dead and breaking system is failed.

    World: A gutter where pigs like us are searching for food and sex and the dirtiest pigs decides the policies and rules for governance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Apt words to Elaine the reality!!!!!

      Delete
  29. My problem with BJP and other well meaning media persons is that nobody is asking the right questions as being raised in this site. A few example will be in order

    FSB: Why there are so many poor living on Rs.27.50/day in spite of 60 years of Cong.rule and 10 yrs of UPA's.Have they fixed leaky PDS which will be used for food-grain distribution

    IJ Case:Why were different versions by GoI on IJ's role at different times.How many encounters have taken place in UP,Mumbai and other states. Let them all be put to judicial scrutiny. If they are fake,let the perpetrators face the music.

    Batla Enc.: If Digvijay was sure that the encounter was fake,why he didn't go to court(Point raised in this blog). Minorities ke liye itna to banta hai boss!

    26/11 : Digvijay hinted that it was an act by Hindus.No one asked him to explain his story/theory in full.

    Guj 2002 Riots : No one is asking 1) who started it 2) In how many days the riots were controlled? 3) How many Hindus died in the riots and police firing. 4) How many congressmen were involved in the riots. And comparing these figures with Genocide of 1984,Riots of Maliyana,Biwandi,Bhagalpur and so many others.

    On Congress frequently distancing itself from their party leaders for most stupid utterances by Shakeel,Raj Babbar, Some Khan et al and off course Digvijay. With this trend shall we assume that a day is not far when Congress party will distance itself from some comment of SG and RG saying these comments are their personal opinion and not Congress's official line

    So guys ask relevant questions and expose Congress

    PS: How can we allow leaders who are totally cut-off from ground realities (Rs.5 and 12 ka bhar pet khana) making policies for us.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Batla House judgment is due today on Monday. Hope this cop killer Terrorist gets highest possible punishment.

    Martyr MC Sharma Amar Rahe
    Jai Hind

    ReplyDelete
  31. Love this site. Is it possible to have a Hindi version also?

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome and are not moderated so as to allow free speech. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.