Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Kasab Death Sentence: SC Observations on Media

Below is the unedited text from the Supreme Court judgement upholding the death sentence on Ajmal Kasab, one of the terrorists in 26/11. The SC makes some observations about the role of our media which make interesting reading. These are reproduced from the SC order document and run from pages 245 to 249 in the original document. (Emphasis mine)



Role of the media:

402. Before parting with the transcripts, we feel compelled to say a few words about the way the terrorist attacks on Taj Hotel, Hotel Oberoi and Nariman House were covered by the mainstream, electronic media and shown live on the TV screen. From the transcripts, especially those from Taj Hotel and Nariman House, it is evident that the terrorists who were entrenched at those places and more than them, their collaborators across the border were watching the full show on TV. In the transcripts there are many references to the media reports and the visuals being shown on the TV screen. The collaborators sitting in their hideouts across the border came to know about the appellant being caught alive from Indian TV: they came to know about the killing of high ranking police officers also from Indian TV. At one place in the transcript, the collaborators and the terrorists appear to be making fun of the speculative report in the media that the person whose dead body was found in Kuber was the leader of the terrorist group whom his colleagues had killed for some reason before leaving the boat 56. At another place in the transcript the collaborators tell the terrorists in Taj Hotel that the dome at the top (of the building) had caught fire. The terrorists holed up in some room were not aware of this. The collaborators further advise the terrorists that the stronger they make the fire the better it would be for them 57. At yet another place the terrorists at Hotel Taj tell the collaborators that they had thrown a grenade. The Collaborators reply, “the sound of the grenade has come, they have shown the grenade, the explosion has taken place, people are wounded”58. At yet another place the collaborators tell the terrorists at Hotel Oberoi that the troops were making their position very strong on the roof of the building59. At yet another place the collaborators tell the terrorists at Taj Hotel the exact position taken by the policemen (close to a building that belonged to the navy but was given to the civilians) and from where they were taking aim and firing at them (the terrorists) and advised them the best position for them to hit back at those policemen.60 There are countless such instances to show that the collaborators were watching practically every movement of the security forces that were trying to tackle the terrorists under relentless gun fire and throwing of grenades from their end.

403. Apart from the transcripts, we can take judicial notice of the fact that the terrorists attacks at all the places, in the goriest details, were shown live on the Indian TV from beginning to end almost non-stop. All the channels were competing with each other in showing the latest developments on a minute to minute basis, including the positions and the movements of the security forces engaged in flushing out the terrorists. The reckless coverage of the terrorist attack by the channels thus gave rise to a situation where on the one hand the terrorists were completely hidden from the security forces and they had no means to know their exact position or even the kind of firearms and explosives they possessed and on the other hand the positions of the security forces, their weapons and all their operational movements were being watched by the collaborators across the border on TV screens and being communicated to the terrorists.

404. In these appeals, it is not possible to find out whether the security forces actually suffered any casualty or injuries on account of the way their operations were being displayed on the TV screen. But it is beyond doubt that the way their operations were freely shown made the task of the security forces not only exceedingly difficult but also dangerous and risky.

405. Any attempt to justify the conduct of the TV channels by citing the right to freedom of speech and expression would be totally wrong and unacceptable in such a situation. The freedom of expression, like all other freedoms under Article 19, is subject to reasonable restrictions. An action tending to violate another person’s right to life guaranteed under Article 21 or putting the national security in jeopardy can never be justified by taking the plea of freedom of speech and expression.

406. The shots and visuals that were shown live by the TV channels could have also been shown after all the terrorists were neutralized and the security operations were over. But, in that case the TV programmes would not have had the same shrill, scintillating and chilling effect and would not have shot up the TRP ratings of the channels. It must, therefore, be held that by covering live the terrorists attack on Mumbai in the way it was done, the Indian TV channels were not serving any
national interest or social cause. On the contrary they were acting in their own commercial interests putting the national security in jeopardy.

407. It is in such extreme cases that the credibility of an institution is tested. The coverage of the Mumbai terror attack by the mainstream electronic media has done much harm to the argument that any regulatory mechanism for the media must only come from within.



  1. A scathing indictment of the outrageous conduct of the media by the Supreme Court. Alas, the judgement won't impact the egregious and disgraceful conduct of the pliant networks

  2. Thank you for bringing this great piece of information to everyone's notice Ravinar. Great job!

  3. The Hindu, TOI, HT, Outlook, Indian Express --- Front Page anyone ?

  4. can make the bloody media go bankrupt if they are sued in US courts for this shoddy and heinous journalism!

  5. Poor Chetan Kunte....

    can he re appeal based on these judgement of SC.

    1. I hope BDutt read the SC judgement, sooner or later media thugs are getting exposed. Well now Chetan Kunte can look into the eyes of the person who threatened him and show the middle finger.

  6. Can Burqa Dutt now organise "We the People" about SC judgement.

    Because the catchline of Nehru Dynasty TV India is Sach dikhaate hain hum

  7. I believe Chetan Kunte said the same thing !!
    B.Dutt should be interrogated for this now ..
    Thanks Ravi for giving us an opportunity to read this which would be difficult to find for us otherwise ..

  8. mediacrooks are busy dissecting a modi statement today ,not a word about their antinational shennanigans during 26/11. they have a mafia like 'omerta' on this one . how about an abject apology ?they ask modi often enough for one..

  9. thank you for reporting this. although we knew it like 2 years ago(since we saw it) but the supreme court's observations didn't appear in any of the leading newspapers or TV channels. what a shame!!

  10. Why fid the SC not pass some penal structures ( monetary penalty ) suo moto and recommend the govt come up with a time bound action plan so that such stupid coverage does not happen ever again ???

  11. @ravinar sir dont know you still read old post comment.

    I completely agree with this supreme court observation our media is moron. But dont you think our security forces shouldve stopped them and issue them clear warning at that time indeed. i am saying this because it again happened in 2016 pathankot attack. There should be clear orders to our security forces no media channel allowed during operations. What your opinion.


Comments are welcome and are now being moderated due to excessive spam on older posts. Genuine comments by readers will not be blocked. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.