Saturday, October 15, 2011

Barkha Dutt - Queen Of Telly Trolls


A fired journalist creates a fictitious letter from John Doe, as her last column, who threatens to commit suicide for society’s ills. The letter enjoys wide public curiosity and the journalist is hired back. Also hired is a character to play the fictitious John Doe. Before the journalist and her employer know it, John Doe’s movement becomes a real political movement and he really attempts suicide. That’s the story of Frank Capra’s 1941 movie ‘Meet John Doe. Closer home, Bollywood remade that movie as ‘Main Azaad Hoon’ featuring Amitabh Bachchan and Shabana Azmi. In the Bollywood version Bachchan does actually commit suicide. These are works of fiction but good examples of how far journalists can go for sensational stories and lucrative careers. However, there is every reason to believe that even in real life many stories are manufactured, especially in the new dreamland of Indian media. Fame, wealth can lure the best to fake stories and slanted reporting and planted stories.

Not convinced? Okay! In an article titled "Jimmy's World", which appeared in the Washington Post on September 28, 1980, Janet Cooke wrote a gripping profile of the life of an 8-year-old heroin addict. She described the "needle marks freckling the baby-smooth skin of his thin, brown arms." The story engendered much sympathy among readers, including Marion Barry, then mayor of Washington, D.C. He and other city officials organized an all-out police search for the boy, which was unsuccessful and led to claims that the story was fraudulent. Barry, responding to public pressure, lied and claimed that Jimmy was known to the city and receiving treatment. Well, despite suspicions, the Post’s Assistant Managing Editor, Bob Woodward of the Watergate fame, stood by the story. Janet Cooke went on to win the Pulitzer prize for her story. It was finally established that the story was a fraud and Cooke returned the prize and was fired from the WaPo.

TV news media is not all that old in India but has acquired all the bad symptoms of shoddy journalism very quickly. Imagine the luck of TimesNow that the thrashing of Prashant Bhushan happened right in front of their cameras. And they went on to film the whole scene without pausing to think. Soon the scenes were on all the channels. The reason for beating up Bhushan was a statement he made supporting plebiscite in Kashmir. The incident was enough to set up discussions on all news channels with the usual suspects turning up as panellists. And the usual rant was about freedom of speech and intolerance. But this one is about a particular telly troll who considers herself the champion of free speech. Barkha Dutt. Except for some hot heads I don’t even believe anyone would remotely condone the thrashing of Prashant Bhushan. But BD would like the world to believe that there is a huge population of hot heads are spreading hate and encouraging violence.

Now personally, I support ABSOLUTE freedom of speech with no limits and no restrictions. If in that exercise someone defames, libels, incites violence or overthrow of the state or causes real damage to any person or group the courts can make him pay the price. Those who call themselves liberal and tolerant will never support that kind of absolute free speech. Why? Because it would then open the door to speech against the very things they hold dear – their fears, their biases and their hidden agendas. Barkha is fond of calling people who vehemently criticise or ridicule her ‘trolls’. Barkha was even silly enough to threaten a blogger for an article criticising her. That is the level of tolerance she has for opinions and criticism. After peddling all possible biased opinions and analysis on her channel, she then finds solace in sermonising in print. Therefore she writes another article “Argue your case” in Hindustan Times. That this media outlet is a mouthpiece of the Congress is not exactly a big secret, but that’s a different issue.

Her opening shot: “One would have imagined that increased communication opportunities would have led to a greater civility in public discourse. After all, the internet and social media have democratised debate and eliminated the arrogance of a hierarchical talking-down style. Yet, lurking online - usually behind anonymity or names that suggest an evangelical religiosity - are many propagators of hate and violence”. Maybe in her dreamworld Barkha doesn’t understand that the Internet didn’t bring about hate or violence. They have existed for eons. The social network just provides a vent where every other forum has failed. Would NDTV publish all the feedback it gets (if it does have a feedback system) including hateful, negative ones? People in public life need to get used to ridicule, sarcasm, satire and even hate messages. Someone saying “I feel like killing so and so” is not exactly a violent threat. It’s an expression that the literary types like Barkha fail to understand even as they invoke Shakespeare and Lewis Carroll so frequently.

 “What lessons can we learn from our own experience? Is it that as our country travels through a phase of restless flux - the sense of being betrayed by the political leadership - all kinds of subterranean faultlines are being exposed? My instinct is that disillusionments notwithstanding, the majority of Indians are uncomfortable with extremes of any kind - opinion, ideology, politics or religion. Yet, our public discourse has been slotted into black and white boxes in a manner that can only be called anti-intellectual”. The main reason for the hate and ridicule Barkha experiences seems completely lost on her. That biased reporting and opinionated TV shows anger people. As in the case of Cooke’s fraudulent story that won the Pulitzer prize, there is a former Admiral who has mentioned that a lady journalist was the cause of some deaths in the Kargil war. The lessons that Barkha hasn’t learned yet is that terms like Paidmedia, Chormedia, Dalalmedia didn’t come about because people simply wanted to sit in a corner and spread hate or coin new terms.

That many had suspicions of Barkha’s reporting and her doctored panel discussions was finally established when the Radia tapes broke. Amazingly, unlike Janet Cooke, Barkha continues to retain her job. Why? It is something nobody knows but it’s quite possible that she holds many secrets about NDTV and therefore sacking her may not have been a good idea. And she also forgets that much of the anger against her is generated by the kind of people she hosts. She proudly claims that she cut off and never had that Imam Bukhari on her shows after he had called Shabana Azmi a ‘naachnewali, gaanewali’ on her show. There was Taslima Nasreen who was attacked in Hyderabad by the group belonging to A. Owaisi. So why does she host this Owaisi so frequently? The man is foul mouthed, vulgar and has also stated on NDTV that he wants all Indians to convert to Islam. I guess those are ‘liberal’ views that Indians should tolerate and get past.

There is an old case of the publisher of a book called “Rangeela Rasool” about Mohammad. He was murdered. I wonder what Barkha would ever have to say about that. To not acknowledge that much of the intolerance that has invaded this country comes from religious sentiments is to ignore reality. The Kashmir issue also has its roots in religion. Some hotheads thrashing up someone does not mean society as a whole has become intolerant. If anything, it is the so called liberals in the media and in the establishment who have become intolerant of any opposing views. That’s the reason Barkha finds so many trolls on the net and has to use the block button so often.

Anna's Team clearly struck a chord and tapped into a deep public anger. So, it was not surprising at all when its members were heralded as new-age heroes. Yet, the moment, any member of the team deviated from a certain kind of online consensus, they were heaped with abuses and vitriol. Whether it was Kiran Bedi's criticism of the arbitrary arrest of IPS officer Sanjiv Bhatt or Prashant Bhushan's comments on Kashmir and Maoist violence - suddenly the same individuals who had been feted were now being roundly condemned. When I argued on Twitter that serious disagreement with his comments could not in any way justify the sickening assault on Prashant Bhushan, I was immediately targeted by some of these 'trolls' for supporting traitors”. That’s a strange twist of facts. That Anna or his team were feted by people doesn’t mean a permanent fan-base. Barkha must finally realise that such support is for causes and not a blanket sanction. Kiran Bedi tweeted a lot of rubbish about Gujarat and Modi in the case of Sanjiv Bhatt’s arrest. By the end of the day she had changed her stance about Gujaratis. She did not differentiate between Gujarat and Sanjiv Bhatt. The second lie that Barkha peddles is that she makes it appear that online people approved of the thrashing of Bhushan. On the contrary a very huge majority of people online condemned the attack while also stating that his comment was bad. Even Sachin Tendulkar, God of cricket, would have received severe condemnation had he made the same statement as Bhushan. And yes, no one would approve of beating up Sachin either had such an incident were to happen.

How can anyone explain Mallika Sarabhai as a panellist in the case of tolerance? She lies profusely and her own lawyers have exposed her lies. Yet the media insults the public’s intelligence by hosting her frequently. That, dear Barkha, does anger people. NDTV frequently hosts Teesta Setalvad who has been exposed for fake affidavits. That, dear Barkha, does anger people. When Radiagate broke the first response of Barkha Dutt was not “argue your case”… it was a threat, probably of legal action. Barkha also forgets, that it’s the social networks that brought pressure on the MSM to discuss her Radiagate episode when her Hammam friend and others tried desperately to bury it. The media has gone overboard with the case of Bhushan. The same media didn’t find time to discuss the death of a woman called Rajbala who was a peaceful protester and following police atrocity was paralysed and later died. I suppose Rajbala’s death falls within liberal tolerance for the likes of Barkha Dutt.

While Barkha complains about online ghosts and calls them trolls she forgets that like Vicky (Bachchan in the movie Sharabi who has chamchas “wah-wahing” his stupid Shayari) she too has her followers who wah-wah everything she does. Be grateful for that and stop sermonising the trolls. Some of her fans even cite the awards she has won. Well, I did point out the case of Janet Cooke who was awarded a Pulitzer for a fake story. Media awards in India are more of scratching backs than anything else. As far as I am concerned Barkha Dutt is just a Telly troll… who trolls a lot more than any of those online ones she constantly complains of. She is, on TV, the queen of trolls!

35 comments :

  1. Excellent post!

    Barkha and many of her ilk are a threat to healthy democracy, as they peddle half-truths, lies. No response from her boss (if he is!) about why she continues to be serving(?) after Radiagate. In a truly fearless, independent media house, such a person would have been sacked. Murdoch was forced to shut down a paper in UK recently. But in India, these media trolls wipe all their sins with a tissue paper and carry on as if nothing happened.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Without singling out a particular individual,You are compelled to agree that media is becoming a monster. Media rules the roost.. they have solutions for everything! they know everything!!!. they are the authority on every subject from Law and order to health, finance, terrorism, rocket science, politics and what not.Even when they interview Experts in these fields they only have the last word!!!

      Delete
  2. You Rock man!!! Absolutely!!!
    Keep up the good work.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I've been reading ur posts 4 last 3 months, bt its da first time that m commenting. All i want 2 say is- 'keep up the good work'. Ur posts r entertaining as well as informative. And i believe that ur awards (4 da jurnos) r more authentic than the sham awards given by the jurnos to their brethren

    ReplyDelete
  4. great post, ravinar. I lose faith in this world when i read people like bharka dutt. That this person is so popular and has a nation-wide platform is our bad karma. People like you are tearing the masks of these types. Great effort. I wish your writing gets nation-wide reading. All the best. btw, thanx for the aside about John Doe

    ReplyDelete
  5. Excellent write up.Seems like you hv said everything that I would love to say to Barkha.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Physical Voilence is one thing and Intellectual voilence is another higher thing. Physical voilence requires the voilent person to be ruthless to a degree, but intellectually voilent people have to be that same ruthlessness to a very higher degree. Bark-ha displays and fulfills all the qualities of an Intellectually voilent person. People like that are greater danger to the society. As said,the example is how she thrashed the Blogger who exposed her while she did the reporting for 26/11. But the irony is that these Intellectually Voilent person treat the Physically Voilent as a low level intolerant gutter troll.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I have only recently started reading your blog. Absolutely stupendous! Keep up the good work. this country needs you. God bless and more power to your pen! Every happiness always. You deserve it for all the hard, great work you are doing

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anybody remember the case of Stephen Glass.

    ReplyDelete
  9. One more nail in the coffin.

    -PBS

    ReplyDelete
  10. When people have no means of being heard using non-coercive means, they will have to resort to coercion. The selective "freedom of speech" that is practiced in India will cause a steady growth in coercive behavior from people.

    So long as we are "forced" to tolerate Arundhati Roys, Binayak Sens, and their latest pal Bhushan while being denied the freedom to criticize or question Islam, Mohammad (pi** be upon him), Mohandas (sh** be upon him) and Jawahar and so on, there will be Baggas and Vermas who will have no means other than coercion to resort to.

    Those who have twisted concepts of "non-violence" are empty between the ears at best, and are evil people designing machinations for Hindu-decimation at worst. Hindus do not lead to live by the moral dicta of such imbeciles, nor should they surrender to their demoniacal schemes.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Good post,
    The whole notion of "liberal" view is being turned on its head with idiots like Bharka Dirt pushing real liberals to the right as she promotes Islamic and communist values.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Excellent ariticle.. will be very easy if we get the information in audio...it was bit difficult to read such a big article...

    ReplyDelete
  13. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Good one as always.

    These libtards are now transforming from being intellectual to ineffectuals and that hurts their ego as their pockets.

    Lets remember one thing there are no rewards for losers in this world.

    Vir learnt it the hard way. This women will learn it in a still harder way longer she stay more drastic will be the backlash as and when it happens.

    Sincerely

    ReplyDelete
  15. Nice reading. Sharing it!
    -APS

    ReplyDelete
  16. Yet another excellent post,Ravinar. BD lives in her own world of prejudice and hypocrisy. The more the people thump her down for her pretentious ways the more irrational she becomes. She has turned out to be the most communal and the corrupt face of the electronic media. She has taken every opportunity to brand BJP as communal and has consistently targetted Narendra Modi and has played a big role in branding him as communal. How many debates and talk shows that she had hosted to show Narendra Modi in a bad light and encouraged her guests to call him all sorts of names like -Hitler, anti-muslim, butcher. Well well! Now she is being paid back in her own coin. How I love to ask her this question – how does it feel to be branded as anti-Hindu and anti-national? Why should all the criticism and allegations thrown at you anger you? Barkha is a classic case of ‘hoist by one’s own petar(d)’. Here is another good blog http://greatindiandemocracy.blogspot.com/ Jiten Gajaria's recent articles "The Land of Elite" and "Let Gujarat be" are a must read for all!

    ReplyDelete
  17. BARKHA IS NEVER TIRED OF SHOWING HER VENOMOUS FANGS; SHE HAS KANCHA ILLAYA; ANOTHER ASHA SOMEONE TO ABUSE HINDUS & PRAISE NEODALIT QUEEN [OF "FRENCH REVOLUTION" WHO TOLD TO EAT CAKE] CREATING "DALIT PRIDE" MONUMENT COSTNG 800 CRORES. WE ARE SICK; OUR BP RAISED TO DANGEROUS LEVELS WATCHING THIS "WE THE PEOPLE" DIABOLIC SERIAL.

    ReplyDelete
  18. irony of the century. another sham awards.

    Indian of the year hosted by Dalla of the Century.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Indian news media is full of sermonizing crooks but ndtv is the worst of the lot considering they all pretend to be unbiased but all of them have affiliations to politicians sonia singh of ndtv is congress mp rpn singh's wife,nidhi razdan's (omar abdullah's bed buddy) father m k razdan attained the position in PTI because of his soft corner for the congress.NDTV should be boycotted.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Please read this piece also http://marchingonthesand.wordpress.com/2011/10/16/open-letter-to-barkha-dutt/

    ReplyDelete
  21. truly great read. I wish all of india was on internet so power of internet could be successfully utilised for mass awakening..

    ReplyDelete
  22. Man,hw come i missed u these days.I hv been ardent follower of politics n vry well know the lies flouted by missionaries funded media houses of india esp NDTV,CNN-IBN,Timesnow.They must be reduced to ashes.I will nevr miss ur blog from now.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Ravinar, I am yet to read a better narrative about the capricious Barkha Dutt than this. You have absolutely nailed the coffin. I sincerely suggest she reads this and does some self introspection to safeguard her future as a average journalist. Media, like politics, has no faithful friends. She might find herself thrown out of NDTV, who is a fox in sheep's clothing, the moment Center changes to a BJP led government.

    That she is a anti-Hindu demon is needless to say. She should stand in front of a mirror before calling IHs trolls.

    JAI HIND!

    ReplyDelete
  24. dear ravinaar.. where were you..?? i have been following various eminent columnists and vir sanghvi is one of my favourites for the sheer simplisity in which he makes the readers convey his point.. but but now i have to acknowledge that you are better in both content and expression.. this is your third piece after Team Anna - Goodwill Blunting and Rahul Gandhi - Withdrawal Symptoms which i have read today and i cant stop myself from reading your remaining articles.. man.. u need to b an editor of a leading news channel or a paper.. india needs a journalist of your calibre in the mainstream.. i dont have words to praise u further.. thanks a lot lot to provide us these wonderful wonderful articles.. may god bless u to continue the good work u are doing.. vande matatam..

    ReplyDelete
  25. She's just another dalal in the system. And a great pretender.

    ReplyDelete
  26. nice article,
    perfect..
    to add to this,
    when i argued my case,i was told " not necessary and radia tapes are bogus " of having a 1 sentence atleast about radia tapes in this..
    http://www.srilankaguardian.org/2011/10/indias-barkha-in-short-list-of-five.html

    India’s Barkha in short list of five Global TV Greats of 2011

    and this article does not even mention about radia tapes in 1 sentence when this info is a must especially in any article which praises barkha or gives info which is a kind of praise of barkha..

    @straighthindu

    ReplyDelete
  27. great article ......... love it

    ReplyDelete
  28. http://indianordinary.blogspot.in/2011/09/i-hate-you-barkha-dutt.html

    ReplyDelete
  29. Burka Dutt is positively the most annoying journalist on Indian TV. Her periodic monkey grins are so lame and disgusting. All this lady has is, a good command over English, thanks to her St. Stephens graduation. Other than that, she is a mouth piece of Congress. Absolutely disgusting on Gujarat and pathetic on just about anything else.

    When NDTV started, it was THE CHANNEL. SOmewhere along the line, age caught up with Pronnoy Roy and he took a back seat trusting abilities of Burka, Razdan, Vikram etc. Vikram Chandra seems a decent man but stands no chance against bulldozers like Burka and her sidekicks in NDTV set up.The Channel has gone to Dogs.

    Best hope for NDTV is one day Pronnoy selling it to a new Management for many Millions and hopefully, the new Management would banish Burka, Razdan and few other trolls that show up every evening on this disgusting news channel.

    ReplyDelete
  30. This is what I had been waiting to read. Barkha and other journalists of her ilk need to be kicked on their butts. Boycott the NDTV and other such anti-Hindu channels.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Well-written article! Completely agree to all the all view points; NDTV should shut down, most of the anchors are biased, have air about themselves and live in this make-believe world that they are the final word on anything irrespective of whether they have the knowledge or no. Command over English doesn't make a good journalist. Can't stand Nidhi Razdan, Barkha Dutt, and Amitabh Revi!! Let's boycott NDTV and drive out these shallow anchors!!!

    ReplyDelete
  32. excellent article..
    barkha is just an ordinary journalist ,should not be even commented upon,,

    ReplyDelete
  33. Thank you Sir for your time spent on this article.... Every honest Indian should condemn NDTV and their biased reporting. They should realise that their job is to report news and not to distort it or make or break a government ....I want to tell Burkha beware of the 2014 elections and once the BJP forms the government hope some one at least tie up these loose dogs and then I am like ..... " Hey Burkha it makes me sadder when you loose control of your bladder " Lol

    ReplyDelete

Comments are welcome and are not moderated so as to allow free speech. However, comments that are off topic, abusive, defamatory or slanderous may be deleted. Comments disclosing personal information of individuals/entities will be deleted.Comments appearing here do not imply endorsement by author of this blog.