Sunday, February 1, 2015

Tolerance Is Over-Rated - Part 3



One of Narendra Modi’s pet themes or slogans is 65% of India’s population is made up of youth. He uses that context to promote “Make in India” as a major policy to encourage the manufacturing sector. When the Congress tried FDI in multi-brand retail, Arun Jaitley stated: “India will become a nation of sales boys and sales girls". Although I don’t see anything wrong in more sales boys and girls, I agree with the policy of making India a big manufacturing hub given our strengths. I only wonder if Modi will acknowledge one important marketing principle – It is better to have a shortage of your product in the market than to have excess stocks in the warehouse. And that is precisely the problem with our youth population – excess in the warehouse. That may sound inhuman but not so much when you consider that India’s population has been growing uncontrolled and unchecked. To see it as an asset out of compulsion is to ignore a problem. The religion-wise figures for Census 2011 were recently released and are more or less the pic I used in a previous post:

The census report I have linked shows Muslim population has grown by 24% during 2001-2011 while Hindu population has fallen below 80%. In terms of numbers that would mean Muslim population is around 18 crores. Average unemployment hovers between 5 and 9% in India. But in case of Muslim youth, the unemployment is as high as 18% which includes educated ones. Take these figures as indicative. The highest Muslim population growth has been in states like Assam, Bengal and Kerala which is hardly surprising. We also don’t know if all the “illegals” in Bengal, Assam, NE overall or in Maharashtra or Telangana are included in the census. In Assam, Bengal and Kerala the Muslim population has crossed 25%, J&K doesn’t need a mention as it is way above 65%.

It is fair to estimate that a good chunk of the Muslim youth come out of the Madrassa system and find it difficult to find employment in the mainstream economy as compared to other communities. So they either turn to low-skill jobs or sink deeper in poverty. But there are other temptations for the Muslim youth like the ISIS. A Sunday Guardian report indicates over 1000 volunteers had joined the ISIS and which is spreading across Uttar Pradesh, Assam, West Bengal, Kerala, Seemandhra, Telangana and Maharashtra. Investigation reveals many of them haven’t returned because they were disenchanted but to set up ISIS or terror cells in India. Indian authorities have no clue on how to deal with this menace. There was that Mehdi guy who operated a Twitter account in support of ISIS and spreading their ideology. He was an educated-employed youth. Uncontrolled population growth cannot be an asset by any measure and it doesn’t need Einstein to figure out that as the Muslim population grows, so does aggression and militancy. Here’s an extract of Peter Hammond that I reproduced in August 2012:

As long as the Muslim population remains around or under 2% in any given country, they will be for the most part be regarded as a peace-loving minority, and not as a threat to other citizens. (This is the case in: United States --0.6% Australia --1.5% Canada --1.9% China --1.8% Italy --1.5% Norway --1.8%)
At 2% to 5%, they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups, often with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs. (This is happening in: Denmark -- 2% Germany -- 3.7% United Kingdom --2.7% Spain --4% Thailand --4.6%)
When Muslims approach 10% of the population, they tend to increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions. Any non-Muslim action offends Islam, and results in uprisings and threats….. (Such tensions are seen daily, particularly in Muslim sections, in: Guyana --10% India -- 13.4% Israel --16% Kenya -- 10% Russia --15%)
After 80%, expect daily intimidation and violent jihad, some State-run ethnic cleansing, and even some genocide, as these nations drive out the infidels, and move toward 100% Muslim, such as has been experienced and in some ways is on-going in: Bangladesh --83% Egypt --90%  Iran --98%  Pakistan --97%  (Remember Kashmir?)

The first para in the above extract isn’t all that valid anymore. Even 1% population of Muslims is now causing strife and friction in many parts of the world. Here’s an image of stats I had put up in a previous post:

The top 10 countries in the chart above are all facing Islamic strife, especially countries in Europe. France has the highest of 8% Muslim population and they have seen frequent attacks on Jews, intimidation, street violence and the Charlie Hebdo killings. And they are 8% in a smaller country and we are 14% in a country which has a history of communal violence. Some are worried the Muslim population will equal or exceed the Hindu population some day in the future. So people like Sakshi Maharaj want Hindus to have more children and others are doing a “GharWapsi” campaign. The problem is not the danger in Muslim population exceeding Hindus because it doesn’t have to wait that long for serious trouble. Kashmir has shown what can happen. In Assam, Bengal and Kerala we have seen what just about 25% can do. Economic progress and success depends on social harmony.

Our imprudent politicians partitioned this country but even in that they left the job incomplete. If partition was based on religious grounds then it should have been complete. It is inevitable that the violence and strife similar to what we are seeing in and from Pakistan are invariably going to infect states like Bengal, Assam and Kerala. A slow but sure ethnic cleansing of Hindus, like that in Kashmir, is inevitable. In Mumbai there are pockets of no-go zones. Mumbra and Malegaon are Islamic zones. Peace in Gujarat has come after extreme retaliation by Hindus but even that isn’t guaranteed any permanence. Any state, village or town that reaches 10-25% of Muslim population is in for strife. It is not imagination; it is a proven mathematical fact of numbers.

Some of our politicians and most of our media crooks like and cover up for Muslim crimes. Maybe their funding compels them to do so. Many of these crooks, like Mani Shankar Aiyar, come from the Commie hotbed of Cambridge. Yes indeed, most people don’t know that Cambridge is a Commie den just like JNU is. Of course, Jawaharlal Nehru too was soaked in Cambridge, so were Rajiv and Rahul Gandhi. It is a stunning fact that most of Britain’s anti-national spies and traitors came from Cambridge. The notorious five are known but there may be many that weren’t discovered or found. Same is true for India. And it is not as if Oxford is a saint, they too have Marxist clubs. So the Macaulay Putras and Putris in our media who forever hate and abuse Hindus have a background and indoctrination in Commie-love and Hindu hatred. And usually, the Commies in India prefer Islamic ideology because it is quite similar to theirs – hating Hindus being the consequential practice. These crooks in media and politics shouldn’t be tolerated and must be shamed every single day of the rest of their lives.

After every terror attack there is this now laughable statement by politicians, religious heads and jokers in the media who will tell you Islam is a “Religion of peace”. After the killings this is like adding salt to the injury. People are waking up but ever so slowly. Here’s a report from the Spectator:

In France, Britain, Germany, America and nearly every other country in the world it remains government policy to say that any and all attacks carried out in the name of Mohammed have ‘nothing to do with Islam’. It was said by George W. Bush after 9/11, Tony Blair after 7/7 and Tony Abbott after the Sydney attack last month. It is what David Cameron said after two British extremists cut off the head of Drummer Lee Rigby in London… In private, they and their senior advisers often concede that they are telling a lie. The most sympathetic explanation is that they are telling a ‘noble lie’, provoked by a fear that we — the general public — are a lynch mob in waiting. ‘Noble’ or not, this lie is a mistake. First, because the general public do not rely on politicians for their information and can perfectly well read articles and books about Islam for themselves. Secondly, because the lie helps no one understand the threat we face. Thirdly, because it takes any heat off Muslims to deal with the bad traditions in their own religion. And fourthly, because unless mainstream politicians address these matters then one day perhaps the public will overtake their politicians to a truly alarming extent”.

The day is not far off in India when non-Muslims overtake their politicians to a truly alarming extent and retaliate. It is therefore better to sound the warning now than repent later. Narendra Modi claiming youth population being an asset is only partly true. The Imam of Brooklyn has shown the courage to say “We Muslims are a time-bomb and hate Christians”. In India, replace Christian with Hindus and the situation is no different. On the contrary, in India Muslims and Christians unite in their contempt for Hindus. The recent episode of Jayanthi Natarajan has shown how many Christian NGOs have thwarted India’s economic progress to serve their western masters. 

IAS officer C. Umashankar of TN was suspended because he was proselytising and indulged in conversion activities. On a TV show he kept lying in his defence but went on to claim that he owes his allegiance to his Christian faith first and not to the Constitution when it comes to serving the country as a Civil servant. That’s how deep the rot is. Both these faiths, their leaders and our Commie politicians appeal to Muslims and Christians to vote en bloc for the Commie parties from Congress to AAP. But if Hindu leaders made a similar appeal the same politicians and our media morons cry “communal”. In support of this moron Umashankar the usual dolt John Dayal also claimed he follows Christianity because he considers it better than other religions:

The Commie media, politicians, Bollywood, print magazines have all made it mandatory – the more educated a person is, he or she must demonstrate it by slamming and abusing anything that is Hindu or related to Hinduism. These cowards claim Barack Obama’s reference to Article 25 and freedom of religion was an indicator to Modi and the Hindu parties for tolerance. Morons! The same Obama went to Saudi Arabia next and many Americans are asking why he didn’t make a similar statement there. You see, cowards lecture Hindus (who are already excessively tolerant) because they know they are tolerant and will not retaliate. Try doing that in Pakistan or Arabia or elsewhere, it is unlikely you will remain one piece for long. Beyond a point tolerance is not a virtue; it morphs into cowardice and self-destruction.

Let me paint an extreme picture. What if some Hindu gangs too armed themselves with bombs and AK-47s? What if in their anger they bombed or killed some abusive Bollywood movie-makers? What if they bombed the offices of the Hindu-abusing NDTV? They will outrage, condemn and shout that it will not stop their freedom of speech. But let me assure you the cowards will go into a shell and you will not see much abuse for long and continued violent attacks on them will stop the abuse. And that is the fear that Islamists have planted in them. That is why they wet their pants and skirts even mentioning the crimes of Islamists and keep parroting it’s a “religion of peace”. If such an extreme outcome happens would the same media morons and political hypocrites chant “NDTV had it coming” or “the director and actor had it coming” like they do for Charlie Hebdo? But, unfortunately, some do have it coming as constant clashes in Bengal show. Tolerance is over-rated and no one should ever suffer or be killed for being tolerant but history shows only the tolerant are killed

Concluded

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Tolerance Is Over-Rated - Part 2



The spiritual roads to God or the “Power” that runs the universe are many. This is what Hindus believe and are taught. Hindus are also taught that all religions are the same. Many Hindus still chant this nonsense despite an abundance of evidence of it not being true. If all religions are the same, then followers of all religions must believe that. They don’t! The spirit of tolerance should be extended only when there is mutual respect between all religions. The time for mouthing such invalid, false philosophies like “all religions are the same” must be ended by Hindus.

There is a Mohammad Ali Road in Mumbai. It’s famous for its eateries and a delight for gluttony fans. There is one for him in Delhi too. During Eid this road in Mumbai also becomes an open Masjid where Muslims offer mass Namaz on the streets. It’s a phenomenon over the last two decades. Along with MK Gandhi he led the Khilafat movement in India. There are lots of things written about him but here is something he said about Gandhiji that you can ponder over: "However pure Gandhi's character may be, he must appear to me from the point of view of religion inferior to any Mussalman, even though he be without character. He repeated it later, saying, 'Yes, according to my religion and creed, I hold an adulterous and a fallen Muslim to be better than a Mr. Gandhi." Just imagine if a Hindu leader had said this about a Muslim leader. I can imagine your imagination running riot. And this was said about Gandhi who was far more sympathetic to Muslims than to Hindus.

The Sickulars are still reeling under the aftermath of the CharlieHebdo killings. They are at pains to find excuses to justify the actions of terrorists. From NDTV to The Hindu to a whole lot of Commie media the latest one to join the ranks is Outlook. Here’s an excerpt:

While I am all for free speech and all for satire, it must be said that Charlie Hebdo had it coming. That sounds crude and cruel, but Muslims would treat the cartoons as crude and deliberately provocative. And it won’t cut much ice with them if you tell them that the cartoons on the Pope were equally bad. You can lampoon Islam and its followers, as you can lampoon any other religion. You can even make fun of the Caliphs (arguably) but don’t touch the Prophet. Muhammad is no go area. His name is prefaced with ‘Prophet’ or with the appellation “peace be upon him” by his billion followers. You can’t paint him, sculpt him, or build a musical around him a la ‘Jesus Christ—Superstar.’ All that these caricaturists and satirists have to do is to leave one man alone. Not too much of a price to pay for peace, is it?”

Fantastic, isn’t it? It is one thing to argue that the Prophet is a “no go area” but a totally different thing to reiterate “Charlie Hebdo had it coming”. There are many ways to protest strongly but killing isn’t one of them. Had it coming, he says! There are other “no go areas” too and we will get into it shortly. All these scumbags who argue that CharlieHebdo had it coming are at a loss to answer a simple question. 59 people were roasted alive in a coach on a train in Gujarat in 2002. Did these people draw any cartoons? Did they even shout any anti-Muslim or anti-Islam slogans? But when the Hindus retaliated violently these very people claimed genocide, pogrom, state-sponsored violence etc. Seriously, did they expect that Hindus should simply continue to tolerate such unprovoked and unwarranted attacks? Since 2002 Gujarat has seen relative peace where communal relations are concerned. There have been stray incidents here and there but no major communal riots.

The man who wrote the Outlook article (Keki Daruwalla – is not a regular journo, but another Arundhati Roy types that infest Outlook) argues that not drawing the cartoons is a small price to pay for peace. 2002 happened before all these cartoons. And is the writer suggesting that prior to these cartoons the Islamists were peaceful and there was no terrorism? Did 9/11 happen because of cartoons? Did 26/11 happen because of cartoons? Did Madrid or London underground happen due to cartoons? Saif Rahman is an ex-Muslim of Pakistani origin in the UK. Here’s what he tweeted January 26:

It is an unfortunate but inevitable truth – Tolerance of intolerance doesn’t buy peace. It never has. Increasingly, we have only seen that retaliation (and often disproportionate retaliation) stands a better chance of buying peace. Ask the Japanese. Rahman has also written a book “The Islamist Delusion”. Do read the summary on the page I have linked. Rahman has drawn no cartoons of the Prophet but merely written a book criticising the practices of Muslims. He claims to have received 139 death-threats so far. What he summarises in his tweet as the 10 Islamist commandments is for our Sickulars to think about. Playing victim will not help anymore. What should now be clear is that after the Paris incident there are many who are making this absolutely clear to the extremists.

Bobby Jindal, the governor in an American state, was a darling for our media for quite a while as they claimed he was an Indian-American. He disappointed them recently by stating that he is only “American” and that his forefathers came to America to be Americans and not Indian-Americans. More stunningly, Jindal became the first politician to boldly state what many politicians were unwilling to say. Excerpts:

"Let's be honest here. Islam has a problem… Muslim leaders need to condemn anyone who commits these acts of violence and clearly state that these people are evil and are enemies of Islam. It's not enough to simply condemn violence, they must stand up and loudly proclaim that these people are not martyrs who will receive a reward in the afterlife, and rather they are murderers who are going to hell. If they refuse to do that, then they're part of the problem. There is no middle ground here”.

Jindal went on to add in his speech in the UK that some countries have allowed Muslims to establish autonomous neighbourhoods in cities where they govern by a harsh version of Islamic law. Yes indeed, UK is facing this problem and so are many other non-Islamic countries in the world. There are over 700 no go zones created by Muslims in France and though it is not authorised in any form, the police and other services dread to go to these zones. Norway has expelled over 5000 foreigners, mostly Muslims, as action for reducing crime in the country. In a rare departure, British PM David Cameron has finally issued a warning to mosques in Britain to rein in extremists:

Belgians in the Congo. France invaded Algeria for no genuine reason except greed and now Algerians are in large number in France. The Dutch were in South Africa and some other places to subdue the original inhabitants. The Portuguese were in Bombay, Goa and Diu. And there is hardly a country left that Britain had not invaded and colonised. It is very tempting to say “they had it coming”. But it’s not revenge that the Islamists are seeking. If that was the case they could have declared formal wars. But it is intolerance of the culture and systems of the host country while enjoying all its privileges that is causing the problems. This is true in India too. “No go area” said that dumb Outlook writer and that avoiding cartoons will buy peace. I have written before that there are many towns in India that are completely Islamised and are somewhat of a no go zone for non-Muslims. This has happened even in places considered particularly holy pilgrimage locations by Hindus. It is hard to believe this has happened in Rameshwaram:

It is understandable if one makes the mistake of thinking these no go zones are stray cases across the world, although increasingly common. It would help to pause for a minute and think that an entire community was thrown out Kashmir which is now a no go zone for India’s non-Muslims. Can any no go zone be worse than that? Had the authorities acted then or even a few months later the KPs could have returned to Kashmir. They are never going to return – no go zones are forever. No politician is going to be courageous enough to alter the situation. The challenge is to avert creating some more and for that unlimited tolerance has to disappear.


To be concluded

Thursday, January 22, 2015

Tolerance Is Over-Rated - Part 1



Stories of Prithviraj Chauhan’s bravery and valour fill many books in India. He was the king of Delhi. Also famous is the story of his elopement with Samyukta who would become his wife. The barbarian invader Mohammad Ghori was defeated by Chauhan and his army in 1191 as history tells us. A year later Ghori returned and defeated Chauhan and took over his kingdom. Chauhan was later killed by Ghori & Co under captivity. Soldiers’ code of honour often requires they treat their fallen enemy with honour. Prithviraj Chauhan let Ghori get away and did not pursue or kill him. If Ghori had been killed a good chunk of history may have been different. An army declaring war for some dispute or other is understandable. Ghori had no such known dispute except to invade, loot, rape and force Islam in Chauhan’s kingdom. There is a price to pay when you let barbarians get away. They don’t deserve honour, they don’t deserve a pardon. Even Jesus who preached kindness, peace and turning the other cheek ended up on the Cross.

Before and after Chauhan there were waves and waves of Islamic attacks on Indian provinces. Some were repelled, some conquered and some Hindu rulers also made peace with the invaders. Islamic warriors had butchered many and many other countries were fully turned Islamic – Persia, countries in Africa, Syria, the current state of Israel, Egypt, even Spain and parts of Europe and so on. Despite the invasion in India being the bloodiest the Hindus somehow refused to be totally conquered. Akbar’s general at Haldi Ghati was Rana Pratap’s relative. He refused to be conquered. Today, the Muslims in India, Pakistan and elsewhere claim they are the victims. The generally peaceful race of Indians, consisting of Hindus, Buddhists and Sikhs, came to be known as tolerant because they withstood the barbarism of the invaders. Maybe they set a wrong precedence.

Cut to 20th century, Reginald Dyer, aka The Butcher of Jallianwallah Bagh, killed hundreds of innocent people. He wasn’t punished. He was celebrated as a hero in Britain. A classic appeasement of the Nazis was the 1938 agreement between British PM Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler, which allowed Germany to occupy Czechoslovakia. As Winston Churchill put it – that was hoping the crocodile would eat its appeaser the last. MK Gandhi wasn’t so much against violence as he was in support of non-violence, especially when it came to his own life. But MKG is commonly cited as the apostle of non-violence for only the Hindus to practically follow. This balderdash needs to be dispelled.  

***************

Charlie Hebdo is now more known across the world that it was ever before, for obvious reasons. Following the terror attack and killing of a dozen people the Sickulars across the world have been groping for excuses to condone the attack. They suggest that religion must not be mocked and anyone who does will have to pay a price for it. Typically, the Indian media blacked out the CH images that caused offence. A couple of papers who reproduced the images willingly or accidentally had this to offer:

The cowards at “The Hindu” and “Mint” who brag about freedom of speech and all that suddenly got cold feet when it comes to Islamic cartoons. Everyone has learned by now that the Indian media’s idea of free speech is to abuse Hindus and Hinduism. Why? Because this lot is tolerant! The Hindus have historically given these Commies the idea that they will tolerate any crap thrown at them and have emboldened them to all kinds of nonsense. In the case of MF Hussain’s nude paintings of Hindu Goddesses all these Commies defended his right to freedom of expression. Many papers and magazines reproduced his porn. None withdrew or apologised. The Hindus didn’t kill Hussain. They just filed cases against him and even that is considered an attack on him by the Commies. The same Commies whined when Wendy Doniger’s anti-Hindu book was pulped by her publisher. The Hindus posed no physical or death-threat to her. It was some guy who filed a case and when it was certain that court would find Doniger’s book to be abusing Hinduism the publishers decided to dump it. What would it take for these wimps to acknowledge the truth? Here’s Malini P of The Hindu applauding the Pope for his stupid statement:

Richard Dawkins is a prominent atheist but even religious people who are sensible would find the Pope’s statement absurd. The Pope said “One cannot provoke, one cannot insult other people’s faith, one cannot make fun of faith” and that those who did “can expect a punch”. He jokingly added "If my good friend Dr. Gasbarri says a curse word against my mother, he can expect a punch”. That is as dumb as it can get and our media idiots are thrilled about it. Malini P, of the anti-Hindu paper, claims the Pope understands a “multicultural” world.  Really? Left to the Pope’s whims he would like the whole of India (and world) turn Catholic. Someone cursing a mother getting punched in return is the same as murdering a dozen people? We have a street-thug like Rajdeep Sardesai who roughed up a man for heckling him in retaliation to Rajdeep’s abuse. I have stated in “War on Hindus-3” that many towns in India have been completely Islamised. They are “no go” zones. In major cities we have Muslim ghettos which are avoided by others. Some Europeans and Americans are waking up to this reality in their own towns and cities. We shall see

***************

We have now experienced how our media lies about events and stories. These Commie pimps are scared of Islamic terror as much as the Pope is. Fear is not unnatural but the media shows that they will trample upon you when they know will know you won’t hit back with violence and murder. English Defence League was formed in England to counter the Islamisation and the attacks by Muslim gangs on their soldiers, Jews and other random attacks. One of their founders was Tommy Robinson. He and his colleagues were on a charity march and here is the Channel4 report on an incident that happened during this walk in East London (0.42 mins):

video
The guy in the black T-shirt and dark glasses is Kevin Carroll of the EDL. The report mentions a clash with the guys in blue and red shirts and the image shows Kevin as the one who is offensive. Is that what really happened? People are now video-taping such events knowing what to expect of the media (and the impotent, cowardly Police). Here’s the part that Channel4 did not show its viewers (3.28 mins):

video
As the video shows, the guy in the blue shirt attacks Kevin who retaliates. The Police let the two guys walk away. They don’t arrest the attackers but instead arrest Robinson and Carroll. That’s Dhimmitude for you. Is it any different in India? Clearly, there is hardly any doubt that the two guys (in blue and red shirts) were planted by the police to provoke a conflict and create a “public disturbance” situation for which they can then arrest the EDL guys. And because the EDL guys protest the Islamic terror in their towns they are labelled Nazis, fascists and racists. Typical nonsense by “Sickular” thugs who label anyone who protests their crimes, with despicable names (full Robinson video on Youtube).

There have been thousands of terror attacks by Islamic forces over the years. Political and media cowards tried their best to wash the sins. It took the slaughter of cartoonists to wake up politicians to finally realise tolerance doesn’t pay. In this day and age, tolerance is increasingly the attribute of wimps and cowards. Tolerance is over-rated. More in the next part.